--- name: collab-planner description: Collaboration planning tool — analyze content overlap between you and potential collaborators, propose win-win collaboration formats (cross-posts, interviews, co-authored content, joint series). Leverages competitor-scout data and profile analysis. --- # Collaboration Planner Find and plan content collaborations that benefit both you and your partner. ## When to Activate - User says `/collab` or `/collab {handle}` - User asks "who should I collaborate with?" - User asks "plan a collab with {name}" - User wants to grow audience through partnerships ## Prerequisites - `~/.content-autopilot/profile.json` must exist - Optional: `competitor-analysis.json` (for overlap analysis) - Optional: `content-history.json` (for topic matching) ## Commands ### `/collab {handle}` — Analyze and plan collaboration with a specific creator ### `/collab suggest` — Suggest potential collaborators based on your niche ### `/collab formats` — Show all available collaboration formats ## Collaboration Formats | Format | Effort | Reach Boost | Best For | |--------|--------|-------------|----------| | Cross-mention | Low | 1.2x | Quick visibility boost | | Quote + Comment | Low | 1.5x | Building relationship | | Joint X Thread | Medium | 2x | Shared audience exposure | | Interview (note) | Medium | 2.5x | Authority building | | Co-authored Article | High | 3x | Deep expertise showcase | | Joint Series | High | 4x | Long-term audience growth | | Challenge/Campaign | Medium | 3x | Community engagement | ## Workflow: Analyze Collaborator (`/collab {handle}`) ### Step 1: Research the Collaborator Use WebSearch to gather information: ``` Search: "{handle} note" OR "site:note.com/{handle}" Search: "{handle} X" OR "from:{handle}" (Twitter) Search: "{handle} profile" "{handle} about" ``` Extract: - Content topics and niche - Audience size (approximate) - Content style and frequency - Platform presence (note, X, Instagram) ### Step 2: Overlap Analysis Compare your profile with the collaborator: ``` ============================================ Collaboration Analysis You × {collaborator_name} ============================================ --- Topic Overlap --- Shared interests: - {topic A} (you: {count} posts, them: {count} posts) - {topic B} (you: {count} posts, them: {count} posts) Your unique topics: {topic C}, {topic D} Their unique topics: {topic E}, {topic F} Overlap score: {percentage}% (20-40% = ideal — enough common ground, enough differentiation) (>60% = too much overlap — may feel competitive) (<20% = too little overlap — hard to find common audience) --- Audience Comparison --- Your audience: {audience_description} Their audience: {audience_description} Overlap estimate: {low/medium/high} New audience potential: {estimate} --- Style Compatibility --- Your style: {style.tone} Their style: {observed_style} Compatibility: {high/medium/low} ``` ### Step 3: Propose Collaboration Ideas Based on the overlap analysis, suggest 3-5 collaboration ideas: ``` --- Collaboration Proposals --- 1. [Quick Win] Cross-Mention Thread You tweet about {shared_topic}, mention {handle}'s perspective They quote-tweet with their take Effort: Low | Expected reach: +{estimate}% impressions Draft tweet: "{draft_tweet_mentioning_them}" 2. [Medium] Interview on note You interview {handle} about {their_unique_topic} Publish on your note → they share with their audience Effort: Medium | Expected reach: +{estimate}% new note followers Topic: "{interview_topic_suggestion}" 5 interview questions: Q1: {question} Q2: {question} Q3: {question} Q4: {question} Q5: {question} 3. [Ambitious] Joint 5-Day Series Alternate publishing: Day 1 (you) → Day 2 (them) → ... Topic: "{joint_series_topic}" Your angle: {your_perspective} Their angle: {their_perspective} Effort: High | Expected reach: +{estimate}% for both 4. [Community] "{topic}" Challenge 7-day challenge where both audiences participate Daily prompt published alternately by you and them Effort: Medium | Expected reach: +{estimate}% engagement Challenge outline: {brief_outline} Which format interests you? (1-4 / or describe your own idea) ``` ### Step 4: Generate Outreach Message After the user selects a format, draft an outreach message: ``` --- Outreach Message Draft --- Platform: {X DM / note comment / email} Subject: {collab_format}のご提案 — {your_name} {collaborator_name}さん、はじめまして。 {your_name}と申します。{theme.main}について{platform}で発信しています。 {handle}さんの「{specific_content_reference}」の記事、とても参考になりました。 特に{specific_point}の視点は、私の読者にも響く内容だと思います。 ぜひ{collab_format_description}で一緒にコンテンツを作れないかと思い、 ご連絡しました。 {specific_proposal_details} お互いの読者に新しい価値を届けられると思いますが、いかがでしょうか？ {your_name} {your_platforms} --- Customize this message before sending. ``` ### Step 5: Plan Execution If the user proceeds, create an execution plan: ``` --- Collaboration Execution Plan --- Format: {selected_format} Partner: {collaborator_name} Timeline: {proposed_dates} Pre-collaboration: [ ] Send outreach message [ ] Agree on format, topic, and timeline [ ] Share profile.json style notes (so content feels cohesive) During: [ ] {step_1} [ ] {step_2} [ ] {step_3} Post-collaboration: [ ] Cross-promote final content [ ] Thank publicly on each platform [ ] Measure reach/engagement increase [ ] Record in content-history.json ``` ## Suggest Collaborators (`/collab suggest`) If competitor-analysis.json exists, suggest from: 1. Competitors with complementary (not identical) content 2. Creators in adjacent niches found during research 3. Active commenters/engagers from content-history ``` Potential Collaborators: 1. {name} — {niche} Overlap: {percentage}% | Audience: ~{size} Why: {reason this would be a good collab} 2. {name} — {niche} Overlap: {percentage}% | Audience: ~{size} Why: {reason} 3. {name} — {niche} Overlap: {percentage}% | Audience: ~{size} Why: {reason} Analyze: /collab {handle} for detailed planning ``` ## Quality Gate Before delivering: - [ ] Collaborator research is based on public information only - [ ] Overlap analysis is accurate and data-backed - [ ] Proposals are genuinely win-win (not one-sided) - [ ] Outreach message is respectful and personalized - [ ] Execution plan is realistic and actionable - [ ] Selected format matches both parties' audience and content style