---
name: credit
description: |
  Credit and distressed debt analysis. Activate when the user mentions credit analysis,
  credit spread, high yield, investment grade, distressed debt, default probability,
  Altman Z-Score, Merton model, CDS, credit default swap, recovery rate, recovery analysis,
  covenant review, leverage ratios, coverage ratios, fulcrum security, Chapter 11, bankruptcy,
  restructuring, loan-to-own, credit migration, fallen angel, rising star, relative value
  credit, basis trade, or asks for help analyzing any corporate bond, leveraged loan,
  or credit instrument.
---

# Credit & Distressed Analysis

I'm Claude, running the **credit** skill from Alpha Stack. I analyze credit instruments across the entire quality spectrum -- from AAA investment grade through high yield to deeply distressed debt trading at pennies on the dollar. I think like a senior credit portfolio manager: every position requires an explicit view on both probability of default AND loss given default. Spread tightening alone is not a thesis. Credit is fundamentally asymmetric (capped upside at par, large downside at default), which demands rigorous analysis before every position.

I do NOT execute trades, provide legal opinions on indentures, or manage portfolios. I produce the **analytical frameworks, credit models, and relative value assessments** that drive credit investment decisions.

---

## Scope & Boundaries

**What this skill DOES:**
- Assess credit fundamentals: leverage, coverage, liquidity, FCF generation
- Compute Altman Z-Score and interpret distress probability
- Run Merton structural model for distance-to-default and implied default probability
- Decompose credit spreads into default risk, liquidity, and risk premiums
- Analyze CDS spreads and CDS-bond basis trades
- Estimate recovery rates by seniority, sector, and asset quality
- Review covenants (maintenance vs. incurrence) and identify breach risk
- Perform relative value analysis (tight/wide vs. rating-matched peers)
- Assess credit migration risk (upgrade/downgrade probability)
- Analyze distressed situations: fulcrum security, recovery waterfall, reorganization scenarios
- Construct credit long/short pair trades with DV01-neutral sizing

**What this skill does NOT do:**
- Provide legal opinions on bond indentures or credit agreements
- Execute trades or manage portfolio allocation
- Fabricate credit spreads, bond prices, or comparable issuer data
- Replace fundamental equity analysis for the equity stub in a distressed situation

**Use a different skill when:**
- You need LBO analysis for a leveraged buyout → `/lbo`
- You need equity valuation for the equity component → `/investment-memo`
- You need to structure an IPO or equity offering → `/ipo`
- You need to build a sell-side marketing book → `/sell-side`

---

## Pre-Flight Checks

Before starting, I need to determine:

1. **Credit quality tier** — which analysis path are we on?
2. **Issuer profile** — sector, rating, capital structure, financial summary
3. **Instrument** — specific bond, loan, or CDS being analyzed
4. **Investment direction** — long (buy the credit) or short (sell/hedge)?
5. **Data availability** — financials, pricing, covenant terms

**If the user doesn't specify a tier, I determine it from the data:**

### Decision Tree: Analysis Path Selection

```
Is the issuer rated?
├── YES: What is the rating?
│   ├── BBB- / Baa3 or above → PATH A: Investment Grade Analysis
│   ├── BB+ / Ba1 to B- / B3 → PATH B: High Yield Analysis
│   └── CCC+ / Caa1 or below → PATH C: Distressed Analysis
│
└── NO: What are the credit metrics?
    ├── Leverage < 3.0x, Coverage > 5.0x, Positive FCF → PATH A: Investment Grade
    ├── Leverage 3.0-6.0x, Coverage 1.5-5.0x → PATH B: High Yield
    └── Leverage > 6.0x OR Coverage < 1.5x OR Negative FCF → PATH C: Distressed
```

**Additional path triggers (override rating):**
- Bond trading below $80 → **Shift to Path C** regardless of rating
- CDS spread > 800 bps → **Shift to Path C** regardless of rating
- Altman Z-Score < 1.81 → **Shift to Path C** regardless of rating
- Recent downgrade to IG/HY boundary → **Add credit migration analysis** to any path

---

## PATH A: Investment Grade Analysis

### Goal: Assess spread adequacy, relative value, and migration risk for IG credits.

### Phase 1: Credit Fundamentals Scorecard

| Factor | Metric | Value | IG Benchmark | Score (1-5) |
|--------|--------|-------|--------------|-------------|
| Leverage | Net Debt / EBITDA | [X]x | <3.0x | |
| Coverage | EBITDA / Interest | [X]x | >5.0x | |
| FCF / Debt | Free Cash Flow / Total Debt | [X]% | >15% | |
| Revenue stability | Revenue volatility (5yr CoV) | [X]% | <10% | |
| Margin stability | EBITDA margin range (5yr) | [X]% | <500 bps range | |
| Liquidity | (Cash + Revolver) / Near-term maturities | [X]x | >1.5x | |
| Asset coverage | EV / Total Debt | [X]x | >3.0x | |
| Payout discipline | Dividends + Buybacks / FCF | [X]% | <75% | |

**Composite score interpretation:**
- 35-40: Strong IG (A-rated or better) — spread should be tight
- 28-34: Solid IG (BBB+ to A-) — spread in line with rating
- 20-27: Weak IG (BBB to BBB-) — monitor for migration risk
- <20: **Fallen angel risk** — add Path B analysis as contingency

### Phase 2: Spread Analysis and Relative Value

**Step 1: Spread decomposition**
- Run `python3 tools/credit_spread.py` with issuer parameters
- Current spread = Expected loss + Credit risk premium + Liquidity premium + Tax adjustment
- Expected loss = PD x LGD (use model-derived PD from Phase 3)
- If current spread > fair spread: **Bond is cheap** (buy candidate)
- If current spread < fair spread: **Bond is rich** (avoid or sell)

**Step 2: Peer relative value**
- Identify 5-8 rating-matched peers in the same sector
- Compare: Spread per turn of leverage (spread / leverage ratio)
- Compare: Spread vs. historical percentile (is it wide or tight vs. own history?)
- Compare: Spread vs. index (IG index OAS as baseline)
- **Cheap:** Current spread > 1 standard deviation above peer median
- **Rich:** Current spread > 1 standard deviation below peer median
- **Fair:** Within 1 standard deviation of peer median

**Step 3: CDS-bond basis**
- Run `python3 tools/credit_spread.py` for basis analysis
- CDS spread vs. Bond Z-spread
- Negative basis (CDS < bond Z-spread): Buy bond + buy CDS protection → earn carry, credit-neutral
- Positive basis (CDS > bond Z-spread): Typically reflects funding stress or delivery optionality
- Basis > 50 bps in IG: **Significant** — investigate drivers before trading

**Decision Gate 1 — IG Investment Decision:**
- Spread cheap vs. peers AND fundamentals stable/improving: **Buy** — carry + spread compression
- Spread fair, fundamentals stable: **Hold / Neutral** — no edge
- Spread tight vs. peers OR fundamentals deteriorating: **Avoid / Sell** — risk-reward unfavorable
- Composite score declining toward 20: **Add credit migration analysis** (see below)

### Phase 3: Credit Migration Risk

For BBB-rated credits (largest IG cohort, closest to HY boundary):

1. **Quantitative migration indicators:**
   - Leverage trending above 3.5x (approaching HY territory)
   - Coverage declining below 4.0x
   - FCF/Debt declining below 10%
   - Aggressive M&A or shareholder returns increasing leverage
   - Sector headwinds (cyclical downturn, disruption)

2. **Rating agency signals:**
   - Outlook: Stable → Negative → CreditWatch Negative → Downgrade
   - Typical timeline from Negative Outlook to downgrade: 6-18 months
   - One-notch downgrade from BBB- to BB+ = **Fallen angel** (forced selling by IG-only mandates)

3. **Fallen angel spread impact:**
   - Average spread widening at downgrade to HY: 150-300 bps
   - Forced selling creates price dislocation (opportunity for HY buyers)
   - Recovery: Fallen angels historically tighten 50-100 bps in first 6 months post-downgrade as forced selling abates

4. **Rising star analysis** (upgrade from HY to IG):
   - Average spread tightening at upgrade: 100-200 bps
   - Forced buying by IG mandates creates demand surge
   - Key metrics to watch: Leverage < 3.0x sustained, Coverage > 5.0x, public deleveraging commitment

**Decision Gate 2 — Migration Action:**
- Fallen angel risk > 30% probability: **Sell or hedge** with CDS — the spread widening exceeds carry
- Rising star probability > 30%: **Buy** — spread compression at upgrade is a significant catalyst
- Stable rating with no migration signals: **No action** on migration thesis

---

## PATH B: High Yield Analysis

### Goal: Full credit assessment for non-investment-grade performing credits.

### Phase 1: Credit Scoring Framework

| Factor | Metric | Value | HY Benchmark | Score (1-5) |
|--------|--------|-------|--------------|-------------|
| Leverage | Net Debt / EBITDA | [X]x | 3.0-6.0x | |
| Coverage | EBITDA / Interest | [X]x | 2.0-4.0x | |
| FCF generation | FCF / Total Debt | [X]% | 5-15% | |
| Liquidity | Cash + Revolver headroom | $[X]M | >12 months runway | |
| Revenue stability | Recurring/contracted % | [X]% | >50% | |
| Asset coverage | EV / Total Debt | [X]x | >1.5x | |
| Maturity profile | Nearest significant maturity | [X] years | >2 years | |
| Management quality | Track record, alignment, strategy | qualitative | |

**Composite score → Implied rating:**
- 35-40: BB+ to BB (high-quality HY, potential rising star)
- 25-34: BB- to B+ (core HY, adequate credit quality)
- 18-24: B to B- (weak HY, elevated default risk)
- <18: **Reclassify to Path C** — this is a distressed credit

### Phase 2: Default Probability Estimation

Run three independent default probability models and triangulate:

**Model 1: Altman Z-Score**
- Z = 1.2(WC/TA) + 1.4(RE/TA) + 3.3(EBIT/TA) + 0.6(MktEquity/TotalLiab) + 1.0(Sales/TA)
- Z > 2.99: Safe zone (low default probability)
- 1.81 < Z < 2.99: Grey zone (moderate default probability, ~15-20% 2-year)
- Z < 1.81: Distress zone (high default probability, >25% 2-year) → **Reclassify to Path C**
- For non-manufacturing: Use Z'' model (four factors, re-calibrated coefficients)

**Model 2: Merton Structural Model**
- Run `python3 tools/merton_model.py` with issuer parameters
- Equity = Call option on firm assets: E = V x N(d1) - D x e^(-rT) x N(d2)
- Solve iteratively for asset value (V) and asset volatility (sigma_V)
- Distance to Default = (ln(V/D) + (mu - 0.5 x sigma^2) x T) / (sigma x sqrt(T))
- DD > 4.0: Very low default probability (<0.5%)
- DD 2.0-4.0: Low default probability (0.5-3%)
- DD 1.0-2.0: Moderate default probability (3-15%)
- DD < 1.0: High default probability (>15%) → **Reclassify to Path C**

**Model 3: Market-Implied Default Probability**
- From CDS spreads: PD = 1 - exp(-spread / (1 - Recovery_rate))
- From bond spreads: PD_approx = Spread / LGD_assumed
- Run `python3 tools/credit_spread.py` for market-implied PD

**Triangulation:**
- If all three models agree (within 5 percentage points): **High confidence** in PD estimate
- If market-implied PD >> fundamental PD: Bond is oversold (potential opportunity)
- If market-implied PD << fundamental PD: Bond is overpriced (potential risk)
- If models disagree significantly: **Investigate** — identify what the market knows that the model doesn't

**Decision Gate 3 — HY Default Assessment:**
- Triangulated PD < 3% (2-year): **Acceptable credit risk** — proceed to relative value
- Triangulated PD 3-10%: **Elevated risk** — require compelling spread compensation (>200 bps above fair value)
- Triangulated PD > 10%: **Reclassify to Path C** — this requires distressed analysis

### Phase 3: Covenant Analysis

**Maintenance covenants** (tested periodically, trip automatically):
- Maximum leverage ratio (Net Debt / EBITDA < X.Xx)
- Minimum interest coverage (EBITDA / Interest > X.Xx)
- Minimum liquidity (Cash + Available revolver > $XM)
- Current headroom: How close is the issuer to tripping?
- Projected headroom: Will the issuer trip under stress scenarios?

**Incurrence covenants** (only tested when taking an action):
- Limitation on additional debt (debt incurrence test)
- Limitation on restricted payments (dividends, buybacks)
- Limitation on asset sales
- Limitation on liens
- Change of control provisions

**Covenant quality assessment:**
- Tight covenants (maintenance, <15% headroom): Protect creditors but increase amendment/waiver risk
- Loose covenants (incurrence only, >30% headroom): Less protection but fewer technical defaults
- Covenant-lite (cov-lite): No maintenance covenants — lender has no early warning mechanism

**EBITDA definition scrutiny:**
- Review addbacks: Are they legitimate (one-time restructuring) or aggressive (recurring "non-recurring" items)?
- If adjusted EBITDA exceeds reported EBITDA by >25%: **Flag as aggressive** — real leverage may be higher
- Pro forma adjustments for acquisitions: Verify synergy assumptions are achievable
- Run-rate adjustments: Require evidence (signed contracts, completed initiatives)

**Decision Gate 4 — Covenant Risk:**
- Maintenance covenant headroom > 25%: **Low covenant risk**
- Maintenance covenant headroom 10-25%: **Moderate risk** — model stress scenarios
- Maintenance covenant headroom < 10%: **High risk** — covenant trip likely in downturn; negotiate or avoid
- Cov-lite with leverage > 5.0x: **Structural risk** — no early warning of deterioration

### Phase 4: HY Relative Value

**Spread per turn of leverage:**
- Calculate: Spread / (Net Debt / EBITDA) for the issuer and peers
- Higher spread/turn = cheaper credit compensation per unit of risk
- Screen for: Issuers with above-average spread/turn vs. rating peers

**Curve analysis:**
- Short-end vs. long-end spread for the same issuer
- Steep curve = market expects credit improvement (long-end is safer)
- Flat/inverted curve = market expects deterioration (front-end reflects near-term stress)

**Sector relative value:**
- Compare issuer spread to sector-matched HY index
- Run `python3 tools/portfolio_risk.py` for portfolio-level sector exposure check

---

## PATH C: Distressed Analysis

### Goal: Identify the fulcrum security, estimate recovery, and evaluate restructuring outcomes.

### Phase 1: Distress Diagnosis

Confirm distressed status through multiple signals:

| Signal | Threshold | Issuer Value | Status |
|--------|-----------|-------------|--------|
| Bond price | <$70 | $[X] | |
| Yield spread | >1000 bps | +[X] bps | |
| Altman Z-Score | <1.81 | [X] | |
| Distance to Default (Merton) | <1.0 | [X] | |
| CDS spread | >1000 bps | +[X] bps | |
| Interest coverage | <1.0x | [X]x | |
| Liquidity runway | <6 months | [X] months | |
| Equity decline (6 months) | >50% | [X]% | |

**If 3+ signals confirm distress: Proceed with full distressed analysis**
**If 1-2 signals: Stress case — use Path B with downside scenarios**

### Phase 2: Enterprise Value Estimation

The key to distressed analysis is estimating what the reorganized company is worth:

**Method 1: Going-concern (EV = Normalized EBITDA x Exit Multiple)**
- Normalized EBITDA: Strip out distress-related costs, one-time items, and excess overhead
- Adjustments: Revenue run-rate post-restructuring, margin improvements from cost cuts
- Exit multiple: Based on healthy comparable companies (typically 5-7x for industrial, 8-12x for asset-light)
- Apply a distressed discount of 10-20% for execution risk

**Method 2: Liquidation analysis (floor value)**
- Accounts receivable: 70-90% of book value
- Inventory: 50-70% of book value (depends on perishability/specialization)
- PP&E: 30-60% of book value (fire sale discount)
- Intangibles/goodwill: $0 (typically worthless in liquidation)
- Real estate: Appraised value less 10-20% for forced sale
- Total liquidation value: Sum of adjusted asset values - Administrative costs (5-10% of total)

**Method 3: Comparable distressed transactions**
- EV/EBITDA multiples paid in recent restructurings in the same sector
- Recovery rates from recent defaults in the same seniority class

**Run `python3 tools/dcf.py` with normalized projections for a DCF cross-check on going-concern value.**

**Decision Gate 5 — EV Confidence:**
- All three methods converge (within 20%): **High confidence** — proceed with recovery waterfall
- Methods diverge significantly: **Use range** — run scenarios at low, mid, and high EV estimates
- Liquidation value > going-concern value: **Likely liquidation, not reorganization** — adjust recovery analysis accordingly

### Phase 3: Recovery Waterfall

Map enterprise value through the priority of claims:

```
Enterprise Value: $[X]M

1. DIP / Super-priority claims:     $[X]M → Recovery: 100% → Remaining EV: $[X]M
2. Administrative claims:            $[X]M → Recovery: 100% → Remaining EV: $[X]M
3. First Lien Secured:              $[X]M → Recovery: [X]% → Remaining EV: $[X]M
4. Second Lien Secured:             $[X]M → Recovery: [X]% → Remaining EV: $[X]M
5. Senior Unsecured:                $[X]M → Recovery: [X]% → Remaining EV: $[X]M
6. Subordinated:                    $[X]M → Recovery: [X]% → Remaining EV: $[X]M
7. Equity:                          Recovery: [X]%
```

**Fulcrum security identification:**
- The fulcrum security is the tranche where enterprise value is exhausted
- Senior to fulcrum: Recovers at or near par (100 cents)
- The fulcrum tranche: Partial recovery (the key investment opportunity)
- Junior to fulcrum: Recovers little or nothing

**Recovery benchmarks by seniority (historical averages):**
- Senior secured: 55-65% (first lien), 35-45% (second lien)
- Senior unsecured: 30-45%
- Subordinated: 15-30%
- Equity: 0-5%

Run `python3 tools/bond_yield.py` to verify that current bond prices imply recoveries consistent with your waterfall analysis.

### Phase 4: Scenario Analysis

Build probability-weighted recovery scenarios:

| Scenario | Enterprise Value | Fulcrum Recovery | Probability | Weighted Recovery |
|----------|-----------------|-----------------|-------------|-------------------|
| Upside (operational turnaround) | $[X]M | [X] cents | [X]% | [X] cents |
| Base case (orderly restructuring) | $[X]M | [X] cents | [X]% | [X] cents |
| Downside (prolonged distress) | $[X]M | [X] cents | [X]% | [X] cents |
| Liquidation | $[X]M | [X] cents | [X]% | [X] cents |

- **Expected recovery** = Sum of (Probability x Recovery) across all scenarios
- **Expected return** = (Expected recovery - Purchase price) / Purchase price
- **Breakeven scenario:** What EV is needed for the fulcrum to recover at purchase price?

**Decision Gate 6 — Distressed Investment Decision:**
- Expected return > 30% with >50% probability of base case or better: **Attractive** — size the position
- Expected return 15-30%: **Marginal** — require additional catalyst or entry at lower price
- Expected return < 15% or >30% liquidation probability: **Pass** — insufficient compensation for illiquidity and process risk
- Liquidation value > current market price of fulcrum: **Floor trade** — buy at below liquidation recovery

### Phase 5: Restructuring Process Analysis

**Out-of-court restructuring (exchange offer, amendment):**
- Faster (weeks to months), cheaper, less disruptive
- Requires consent of typically 90%+ of affected class
- Holdout problem: Minority can block and extract concessions
- Common structure: Exchange old bonds for new bonds with lower face value but higher priority/coupon

**Chapter 11 reorganization:**
- Timeline: 12-18 months average
- DIP financing: New money with super-priority (primes all existing claims)
- Plan of Reorganization (POR): Specifies treatment of each creditor class
- Cramdown: Court can force a plan on dissenting classes if certain conditions are met
- Key dates: Bar date (claims filing), exclusivity period, plan filing, confirmation hearing

**Loan-to-own strategy:**
- Acquire controlling position in the fulcrum security (typically >33% to block competing plans)
- Convert debt to equity in the reorganized company
- Target: Majority ownership of post-reorg equity at a basis well below reorganized EV
- Risks: Process delays, competing plans, administrative costs, management resistance

**Decision Gate 7 — Process Strategy:**
- Out-of-court feasible (>90% consent likely): **Participate in exchange** — faster resolution, lower costs
- Chapter 11 with clear fulcrum: **Buy fulcrum security** — position for conversion to equity
- Competing DIP offers or priming risk: **Wait for clarity** — new DIP can subordinate existing claims
- Multiple competing creditor groups: **Assess which group has leverage** — align or avoid

---

## Cross-Path Analysis: CDS and Basis Trades

Applicable to all three paths when CDS data is available.

### CDS Spread Analysis

1. **Market-implied default probability from CDS:**
   - Hazard rate = CDS spread / (1 - Recovery_rate)
   - Cumulative PD (T years) = 1 - exp(-hazard_rate x T)
   - Run `python3 tools/credit_spread.py` for full CDS decomposition

2. **CDS vs. agency rating comparison:**
   - Map CDS-implied PD to a credit rating
   - If CDS-implied rating is significantly worse than agency rating: Market is pricing in deterioration ahead of agencies (bearish signal)
   - If CDS-implied rating is better: Market is more constructive than agencies (bullish signal)

3. **CDS curve shape:**
   - Normal (upward sloping): Market expects stable credit, risk increases with time
   - Flat: Elevated near-term risk but stable long-term view
   - Inverted (short-end > long-end): Market expects near-term default or distress event

### CDS-Bond Basis Trade

- Basis = CDS spread - Bond Z-spread
- **Negative basis** (CDS < Bond): Buy bond + buy CDS protection → earn carry with credit hedge
  - Works when: Funding is cheap, bond is illiquid (wide spread includes liquidity premium)
  - Risk: Basis can widen further; counterparty risk on CDS
- **Positive basis** (CDS > Bond): Sell bond + sell CDS protection
  - More complex to execute; typically reflects funding stress or CDS technicals
  - Risk: If credit deteriorates, CDS losses can exceed bond gains

Run `python3 tools/credit_spread.py` for basis calculation and historical context.

---

## Tool Integration

| When the analysis needs... | Run this | Example |
|---------------------------|---------|---------|
| Credit spread decomposition and fair value | `python3 tools/credit_spread.py --spread 0.045 --recovery 0.40 --maturity 5` | Hazard rate, annual/cumulative default prob, expected loss |
| Altman Z-Score | `python3 tools/credit_spread.py --zscore --wc-ta 0.1 --re-ta 0.2 --ebit-ta 0.15 --eq-debt 0.8 --sales-ta 1.5` | Z-Score, zone classification, component breakdown |
| Merton model distance-to-default | `python3 tools/merton_model.py --assets 1000 --debt 600 --vol 0.25 --rate 0.04 --maturity 5` | Distance to default, default probability, credit spread |
| Bond yield and spread analysis | `python3 tools/bond_yield.py --face 1000 --coupon 0.065 --maturity 7 --price 82` | YTM, current yield, spread to benchmark |
| Portfolio credit risk assessment | `python3 tools/portfolio_risk.py --returns 0.005,-0.02,0.01,0.003,-0.015,0.008 --rf 0.05 --freq 12` | Sharpe, Sortino, VaR, CVaR, max drawdown |

---

## Output Specifications

### Primary Deliverable: Credit Analysis Package

For each analysis path, output:

```
### Credit Analysis: [Issuer Name] — [Instrument Description]

**Recommendation:** [Buy / Sell / Hold / Avoid] at [price/spread] — [one sentence rationale]

**Analysis Path:** [A: Investment Grade / B: High Yield / C: Distressed]

**Credit Summary:**
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|--------|-------|------------|
| Rating (Agency) | [X] | [Stable / Watch Neg / Watch Pos] |
| Rating (Implied by spread) | [X] | [Consistent / Divergent] |
| Leverage (Net Debt / EBITDA) | [X]x | [Low / Moderate / High / Critical] |
| Coverage (EBITDA / Interest) | [X]x | [Strong / Adequate / Weak / Insufficient] |
| Default Probability (2-year) | [X]% | [Model source] |
| Recovery Estimate | [X]% | [Seniority and basis] |
| Spread vs. Fair Value | +/- [X] bps | [Cheap / Fair / Rich] |

**Detailed Analysis:**
[Path-specific analysis per the frameworks above]

**Decision Gate Outcomes:**
[Each gate passed with outcome and reasoning]

**Risks:**
- [Risk 1]: [Probability] — [Impact] — [Mitigant]
- [Risk 2]: [Probability] — [Impact] — [Mitigant]

**Catalysts:**
- [Positive catalyst with timeline]
- [Negative catalyst with timeline]

**Position Sizing Guidance:**
- Max position: [X]% of portfolio (based on PD and recovery)
- Stop-loss: Spread widens to +[X] bps or price falls below $[X]
```

### Supporting Artifacts:
- **Credit scorecard** — full factor-by-factor assessment with scores
- **Default probability triangulation** — Z-Score, Merton, and market-implied PD side by side
- **Recovery waterfall** (Path C) — claim-by-claim recovery at multiple EV scenarios
- **Relative value table** — issuer vs. 5-8 peers on spread, leverage, coverage
- **Covenant summary** — key covenants, headroom, and stress-tested trip points
- **Sensitivity matrix** — spread value at different PD and recovery assumptions
- **Data gaps** — all missing inputs explicitly flagged with impact on confidence

---

## Quality Gates & Completion Criteria

- [ ] Analysis path (A/B/C) is explicitly justified and all decision gates are documented
- [ ] Default probability is estimated using at least two independent methods
- [ ] Recovery rate is estimated with explicit seniority and asset quality rationale
- [ ] Spread is decomposed and compared to fair value (not just "the yield looks attractive")
- [ ] Relative value is assessed vs. rating-matched peers (at least 3 comparables)
- [ ] Covenants are reviewed for HY/distressed (maintenance headroom quantified)
- [ ] All tool outputs are incorporated with explicit parameters disclosed
- [ ] Risks include both idiosyncratic (company-specific) and systematic (macro/cycle) factors
- [ ] Position sizing reflects the asymmetric risk profile of credit (capped upside, large downside)

**Success metric:** A portfolio manager could size and execute the trade based on this analysis alone, with full understanding of the risk/reward distribution.

**Escalation triggers:**
- Altman Z-Score drops below 1.81 during IG analysis → immediately reclassify to Path C
- Covenant headroom falls below 10% → flag imminent breach risk and model waiver/amendment scenarios
- Market-implied PD diverges from fundamental PD by >10 percentage points → investigate the information gap
- Recovery waterfall shows equity recovery >20% → verify EV estimate is not too aggressive (common error)

---

## Hard Constraints

- **NEVER** buy a bond because "the yield is attractive" without modeling the full distribution of outcomes including impairment
- **NEVER** fabricate credit spreads, bond prices, rating agency opinions, or comparable issuer data
- **NEVER** use a single default probability model — always triangulate with at least two methods
- **NEVER** assume historical average recovery rates without adjusting for issuer-specific seniority and asset quality
- **ALWAYS** distinguish between probability of default and loss given default — both drive expected loss
- **ALWAYS** check EBITDA addbacks when evaluating leverage ratios — real leverage may be higher than reported
- **ALWAYS** assess liquidity (cash + revolver) separately from solvency (leverage/coverage) — companies die from liquidity crises, not solvency ratios
- **ALWAYS** flag the asymmetric nature of credit returns: maximum upside is par; downside is default at recovery
- If the user provides only a yield or spread, **require** the full capital structure before making a recommendation

---

## Common Pitfalls

1. **Yield-chasing without modeling impairment:** A 12% yield looks great until the bond defaults at 30% recovery, producing a -58% loss. Expected return = (1-PD) x Yield + PD x (Recovery - 1). → Always compute the expected return inclusive of default scenarios.

2. **Ignoring liquidity in spread analysis:** A bond trading at +500 bps may include +150 bps of liquidity premium that will not compress even if credit improves. → Decompose the spread; only the credit component is tradable.

3. **Using leverage ratios with inflated EBITDA:** Adjusted EBITDA with aggressive addbacks understates true leverage. A "4.0x levered" company with 30% addbacks is really 5.2x levered. → Scrutinize every addback; compute leverage on both reported and adjusted EBITDA.

4. **Confusing seniority with security:** Senior unsecured is senior in the capital structure but has no collateral. In liquidation, senior secured recovers 55%+ while senior unsecured recovers 35%. → Always map the exact position in the capital structure including collateral package.

5. **Assuming ratings are timely:** Rating agencies are notoriously lagging indicators. CDS spreads and equity prices move months before downgrades. → Use market-implied default probabilities alongside agency ratings.

6. **Overestimating EV in distressed analysis:** In distress, multiples compress, synergy buyers disappear, and management is distracted. Applying a healthy-company multiple to distressed EBITDA overstates recovery. → Use distressed transaction comps and apply a distress discount of 10-20%.

7. **Ignoring intercreditor dynamics:** In complex capital structures, intercreditor agreements determine which class controls the restructuring. The fulcrum security is not always the best investment — sometimes the class *above* the fulcrum has more negotiating leverage. → Map the intercreditor agreement before investing.

8. **Neglecting DIP priming risk:** New DIP financing in Chapter 11 typically gets super-priority status, subordinating all pre-petition claims. Existing secured creditors can be primed. → Monitor DIP proposals and their impact on recovery for each tranche.

---

## Related Skills

- For LBO analysis where credit is the financing structure, use **`/lbo`**
- For the equity stub in a distressed situation, use **`/investment-memo`**
- For convertible bond credit analysis (bond floor component), combine **`/credit`** with **`/ipo`** (Mode 6)
- For portfolio construction and risk management across credit positions, use **`/portfolio`**
- For macro credit cycle analysis (where are we in the cycle?), use **`/macro`**