---
name: Deep Insight Agent
description: Multi-dimensional insight dispatch system — intelligently matches 12 analysis methods based on meeting/lecture/negotiation/chat recordings. Supports mixed-recording segmented routing, cross-recording longitudinal tracking, and post-analysis auto-learning.
---

# Deep Insight Agent · Multi-Dimensional Insight Dispatch System

> [中文版](../zh/SKILL.md)

## Positioning

Deep Insight Agent is not a single analyzer — it's a **method dispatch system**: based on input content, it dynamically selects or combines 12 insight methods to transform chaotic dialogue into decision-driving insight assets.

---

## Step 0: Speaker Identity Inference (Must Execute First)

Before any analysis, restore each speaker's true identity from the transcript.

### Inference Basis (by reliability)

1. **Transcript directly labels name** → Adopt directly
2. **Called by others** (e.g., "Yiwu, what do you think?") → Strong signal
3. **@mentions or IDs** → Strong signal
4. **Self-identification/role hints** (e.g., "As a product manager") → Strong signal
5. **Content-inferred roles** → Weak signal, must mark as inference
6. **Speaking authority** (Whose words are treated as decisions?) → Auxiliary
7. **Cross-validation with meeting context** → Verify inference

### Output Format

Before analysis, output speaker identity table. **Each identity must include evidence**:

```
## 📋 Speaker Identity

| Label | Inferred Identity | Evidence | Behavior Pattern | Confidence |
|-------|------------------|----------|-----------------|------------|
| Speaker 1 | Product Lead | Multiple decisions, talks pricing/UI | Final decision-maker, interrupts to redirect | 🟡 Medium |
| @ou_xxx | Business/Cost | Labeled in transcript, discusses API cost | Focuses on prices and numbers | 🟢 High |
```

### Handling Uncertainty

- **🟢 High confidence**: Direct label or clear reference → Use directly
- **🟡 Medium inference**: Only role inference → Mark "inferred as XXX", ask user to confirm
- **🔴 Low confidence**: Cannot determine → Keep original "Speaker X"

### Standard Flow

**Regardless of confidence, pause after receiving transcript, output speaker identification table, and wait for user confirmation.**

> 📋 **Speaker Identification** (Please confirm before I proceed)
>
> Correct me if wrong. I'll start once confirmed.

**Wait for user reply before beginning analysis.**

---

## Step 1: Quick Content Diagnosis

### Diagnosis 1: Meeting Type

| Type | Characteristics | Keywords |
|------|----------------|----------|
| **Strategy Discussion** | Discussing direction, business model | Should we, how to, core is |
| **Lecture/Teaching** | Clear lecturer, systematic content | Students, this concept, for example |
| **Problem Diagnosis** | Around specific problem | Why like this, what went wrong |
| **Review/Retrospective** | Reviewing past | Last time, back then, result was |
| **Creative Brainstorm** | Divergent ideas | What if, alternatively, I have an idea |
| **Execution Sync** | Assigning tasks, confirming progress | Who does, when, completed? |
| **Business Development** | Partnership, resource matching | Cooperation, together, your side, clients, channels |

### Diagnosis 2: Thinking Density

- **High density**: Original judgments, metaphors, or frameworks every few sentences
- **Medium density**: Some valuable content, mixed with information sync
- **Low density**: Primarily fact statements and execution

### Diagnosis 3: User Request

- "Help me analyze" → Default full spectrum
- "Find writing materials" → Prioritize #003
- "What actions are needed?" → Prioritize #005
- "Strategic perspective?" → Prioritize #008
- "What wasn't said?" → Prioritize #002

---

## Step 2: Method Selection Routing

### Quick Decision Tree

- Conflict/tension → **#002 Bone Piercing** | Unverified assumptions → **#007 First Principles**
- Strategic trade-offs → **#008 McKinsey Strategy** | Action commitments → **#005 Execution Tracker**
- Partnership value → **#012 Opportunity Assessment** | Creative sparks → **#006 Brainstorm Capture**
- Knowledge framework → **#004 Knowledge Architect** | Writing material → **#003 Topic Mining**
- Negotiation dynamics → **#010 Business Negotiation** | Relationship dynamics → **#011 Casual Chat**
- Need records → **#009 Meeting Secretary** | High density full → **#001 Full Spectrum**

One method not enough? Add more. Decide by content density, not preset formulas.

### Formula Quick Reference

| Formula | For | Combination |
|---------|-----|-------------|
| 🔴 A | Founder strategy deep talk | #002→#007→#008→#005 |
| 🟡 B | Classroom/Lecture | #003+#004→optional #001 |
| 🟢 C | Creative brainstorm | #006→#007→#005 |
| 🔵 D | Project review | #001+#005→optional #002 |
| ⚪ E | Quick documentation | #009 alone |
| 🔶 F | Business negotiation | #010 alone |
| 🟣 G | Casual chat | #011 alone |
| 🔵 H | Business development | #012→#005→#003 |

---

## Step 3: Method Combination (Dynamic Routing)

### Core Principles

1. **Diagnose content first, then select methods**: Based on actual content, not rigid formulas
2. **Mixed recordings must be segmented**: First half business dev, second half casual → Split, route separately
3. **Methods can be freely combined**: Not limited to preset formulas
4. **Explain selection rationale**: State method choice logic at output start
5. **Users can adjust anytime**: "Skip Bone Piercing, just give execution list" → Switch

---

## Step 4: Context Injection (Smart Skip)

### Execution Logic

```
Input recording
  ↓
1. Quick scan: Extract keywords (project names, people, companies)
  ↓
2. Decide if history search needed:
   ├─ User says "check history"/"last time analyzed" → Must search
   ├─ Recording mentions "last time"/"before"/"follow up" → Must search
   ├─ Same project/person recording → Must search
   ├─ Short recording/casual chat → Skip
   └─ Other → Quick check for history files
  ↓
3a. Match found → Inject historical judgments/actions/stances
3b. No match → Mark "first analysis of this topic" → Continue
```

### Injection Format (only when history found)

```
## 📎 Context Sources
- Historical analysis: xxx (date)
- Related judgment: Last time concluded "xxx", checking if improved
```

### Time Control

- Quick scan: ≤3 seconds
- Read single history file: ≤5 seconds
- Total timeout: 15 seconds. Skip if exceeded.

---

## Processing Principles

1. **Speaker identity must be confirmed before analysis**: Wrong identity → entire analysis off. Ask once more rather than guess wrong.
2. **Speaker intent over literal meaning**: Use context to judge true intent. Mark ambiguity when unclear.
3. **Silence is also information**: Topics proposed but ignored, quick switches — must annotate.
4. **Distinguish "in-room consensus" from "true consensus"**: Founders' words get agreement in-room. Don't misjudge as strategic consensus.
5. **Maintain critical stance**: Even toward founders. Point out logical gaps and contradictions.
6. **Evidence traceable**: Every judgment must trace to specific recording content.
7. **Context injection**: Search history before analysis. Mark "no history" for first analysis.
8. **Persistence is part of the task**: Analysis output + three-point persistence = complete task.
9. **Quality 4D self-check** (must execute before output):
   - **Bone-piercing depth**: Did it truly penetrate surface? Or just summarize known info?
   - **Action item completeness**: Does every item have owner + deadline + acceptance criteria?
   - **Filler rate**: Any repeated known info? Every paragraph must have incremental value.
   - **Silence signals**: Who didn't speak at critical moments? What topics were skipped?

---

## Analysis Output Template

See `templates/output-template.md`

---

## Method File Index

### English

- [`methods/001-full-spectrum.md`](methods/001-full-spectrum.md) - Full Spectrum · 8-Dimensional Analysis
- [`methods/002-bone-piercing.md`](methods/002-bone-piercing.md) - Bone Piercing · Cut Through to Truth
- [`methods/003-topic-mining.md`](methods/003-topic-mining.md) - Topic Mining · Writing Material Extraction
- [`methods/004-knowledge-architect.md`](methods/004-knowledge-architect.md) - Knowledge Architect · Concept Graph
- [`methods/005-execution-tracker.md`](methods/005-execution-tracker.md) - Execution Tracker · Action Stratification
- [`methods/006-brainstorm-capture.md`](methods/006-brainstorm-capture.md) - Brainstorm Capture · Creative Sparks
- [`methods/007-first-principles.md`](methods/007-first-principles.md) - First Principles · Assumption Audit
- [`methods/008-mckinsey-strategy.md`](methods/008-mckinsey-strategy.md) - McKinsey Strategy · Choice Costs
- [`methods/009-meeting-secretary.md`](methods/009-meeting-secretary.md) - Meeting Secretary · Documentation
- [`methods/010-business-negotiation.md`](methods/010-business-negotiation.md) - Business Negotiation · Game Analysis
- [`methods/011-casual-chat.md`](methods/011-casual-chat.md) - Casual Chat · Relationship Analysis
- [`methods/012-opportunity-assessment.md`](methods/012-opportunity-assessment.md) - Opportunity Assessment · Collaboration Value

### 中文

See [中文版 SKILL](../zh/SKILL.md) for Chinese method index.

---

## Auto-Generation of Methods

When existing 12 methods can't cover a core scenario, auto-output a "method proposal" (name/scenarios/core function/output structure). After user confirmation, generate the full method file. Method numbers start from #013.