---
name: hr-talent-mapping
description: Help TA leaders and workforce planners build individual-level talent maps that track named candidates, internal successors, and external targets against current and future roles. Use when asked to "map talent against future roles", "build a bench for [role]", "track external talent for succession", "create a talent pipeline map", or "identify named candidates for a future opening".
metadata:
  author: Tuan Duc Tran
  version: "1.0.0"
---

# Talent mapping

Track named individuals — internal successors and external targets — against current and anticipated roles, so hiring and succession decisions can draw on a ready bench instead of starting a search from zero.

## Supported tasks

- Building named-candidate maps for critical or hard-to-fill roles
- Cross-referencing internal succession candidates with external benchmarks
- Tracking external talent relationships over time (warm leads, past applicants, silver medalists)
- Mapping talent against anticipated future roles from workforce plans
- Identifying readiness gaps between mapped candidates and role requirements
- Prioritizing which mapped candidates to nurture actively vs. monitor passively
- Coordinating talent mapping with succession planning and 9-box reviews
- Building geography- or function-specific talent benches
- Refreshing talent maps as candidates change roles or companies
- Reporting bench strength and coverage gaps to leadership
- Feeding talent maps into proactive nurture and CRM campaigns
- Aligning talent mapping cadence with business planning cycles

## Key prompts

### Building talent maps

1. "Build a named-candidate talent map for [role/function] with 3 internal and 5 external candidates, noting readiness and interest level for each."
2. "Cross-reference our internal succession bench for [role] against external benchmarks to identify capability gaps."
3. "What criteria should we use to decide whether a mapped candidate is 'ready now', 'ready in 1-2 years', or 'watch only'?"
4. "Map talent against the roles in our [3-year] workforce plan for [function]."

### Maintaining and prioritizing

1. "Which mapped candidates for [role] should we actively nurture this quarter given upcoming openings?"
2. "Design a cadence for refreshing talent maps so they don't go stale between planning cycles."
3. "How do we track a 'silver medalist' candidate from a past search without it feeling transactional?"
4. "Flag mapped candidates for [role] who may have changed companies or roles recently and need re-verification."

### Reporting and integration

1. "Summarize bench strength and coverage gaps for [critical role family] for the leadership talent review."
2. "How should talent mapping data feed into our succession planning and CRM nurture workflows?"
3. "Build a talent map dashboard structure showing coverage ratio (mapped candidates per critical role) by function."
4. "Draft a quarterly talent mapping update format that highlights what changed since the last leadership review."

## Tips

- Talent mapping only creates value if someone owns keeping it current — assign clear ownership and a refresh cadence, not a one-time exercise.
- Separate "map" from "pipeline" — mapping identifies who exists and where; nurturing and engagement are separate, deliberate follow-on activities.
- Coordinate closely with succession planning so internal and external maps use the same readiness language and don't create conflicting signals.
- Respect candidate relationships — repeated informal check-ins without a real opportunity can feel exploitative; be transparent about intent when engaging mapped candidates.
- Prioritize mapping effort on roles with real business risk (critical, hard-to-fill, or single point of failure) rather than mapping everything equally.