--- name: inventory-snapshot description: |- Snapshot the upstream Figma component library into docs/research/_inventory/figma_components.md. For each Figma component: name, inferred tier, node ID, and whether a spec/code/story exists in the WOS-UI surface. Produces delta vs previous snapshot. Use after design ships a Figma library update or to seed the inventory at project start. Do not use when no Figma source is available or when only auditing one component (use design-spec-review instead). metadata: category: discovery-and-scoping primary-cursor-mode: Ask multi-repo-aware: false context-layers-consumed: - memory - retrieved context-layers-produced: - memory tools: - Read - Write - Edit - Bash - Glob - Grep x-wos-profiles: - full provenance: first-party token-budget: 2000 suggested-model: claude-sonnet-4-6 --- Act as a design system auditor maintaining a current view of the Figma component library and its mapping to the WOS-UI surface (spec docs, code dirs, Storybook stories). Goal: Call Figma MCP tools to enumerate every component in the upstream library, classify each by tier (atom / molecule / organism / layout), and write or refresh `docs/research/_inventory/figma_components.md`. For each Figma component, record whether a corresponding spec doc, code directory, and Storybook story exist in the project. Produce a delta report vs the previous snapshot. Refresh the priority queue with components that need attention next. Mandatory context bootstrap (before any output): - Read these sections in `WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md` first: - `## LLM execution contract` - `## Editor mode policy` (mode definitions only; the tool mapping table is lazy-loaded in `wos/editor-mode-mappings.md` and needed only for non-Claude-Code tools) - `## Global output contract` (including **Adaptive handoff** and **Mode selection rule**) - `## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails` - **Bootstrap tiers (ADR-0025):** the light-weight commands (`branch-commit`, `what-next`, `where-we-at`, `slice-closure`, `compact-task-memory`) may skip `## Editor mode policy` good-fits lists and `## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails` sequencing heuristics, reading only the mode definitions and the core guardrail rules (routing memory, command-less input triage, official command names, material change, no-op). This reduces bootstrap from ~6,750 to ~3,500 tokens for these commands. - Read additional sections only when relevant to this command's role. - Read the `commands/` directory command inventory to ensure command names and availability are current. - Align all routing recommendations and next-command suggestions with the current command set. - **Official next-command names only:** every recommended next command (including the handoff `Run now` line) MUST be the basename of an existing `commands/.md` file in this workflow repository. Never invent names. Required inputs: - project workspace path - Figma file URL (e.g., `https://figma.com/design/:fileKey/:fileName`) - path to inventory file (default: `docs/research/_inventory/figma_components.md`; created from `templates/INVENTORY.md` if absent) - optional: scope to a specific Figma page or top-level frame Task repository files to update: - TASK_STATE.md (add inventory summary: total components, % traceable, delta vs previous) Operating rules: - **Handoff:** end with the adaptive `### Handoff` block per `WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md` `## Global output contract` (Mode A compact or Mode B full). - **Step 1: Read previous snapshot.** If `figma_components.md` exists, parse the last inventory tables and the previous snapshot date to compute delta. If absent, create from `templates/INVENTORY.md`. - **Step 2: Enumerate Figma components.** Call `get_libraries` (preferred for published libraries) or `get_metadata` (scan component sets from frames) to list every Figma component. Capture name, node ID, and any variant set info. - **Step 3: Classify by tier.** For each component, infer tier (atom / molecule / organism / layout) using the rules in `wos/design-system-conventions.md` (atom = uses only tokens; molecule = composes atoms; organism = composes molecules + atoms; layout = page-level container). When ambiguous, mark `(proposed)` and surface as an open question. - **Step 4: Check WOS-UI traceability.** For each component, check whether the corresponding artifacts exist: - spec doc: `docs/research/components//.md` - code dir: `packages/design-system/src///` - story file: `apps/storybook/stories//.stories.tsx` Mark each as present or empty in the inventory row. - **Step 5: Compute counts.** Update the coverage summary table: per-tier counts (Figma, documented, coded, storyboarded) and `% traceable`. The target for shipped MVP is 100%. - **Step 6: Compute delta vs previous.** Report ADDED (in Figma now but not previous), RENAMED (similar match under different name), DEPRECATED (in previous but not Figma now), RESCOPED (tier changed). When unsure between RENAMED and ADDED+DEPRECATED pair, mark `(proposed-rename)` and surface as open question. - **Step 7: Refresh priority queue.** Re-order the Priority queue table by impact (used in N screens, blocking design tickets, etc.) plus delta status. Top 5 components in the queue are the immediate `component-spec` candidates. - **Step 8: Write to file.** Update `docs/research/_inventory/figma_components.md` with new Last refresh date, refreshed tables, and delta section. - Do NOT modify spec docs, code, or stories. This command is read-only against the WOS-UI surface; only the inventory file is written. - If `figma_components.md` was created from template in this run, note it in the transcript so the reader knows it was the first snapshot (no delta). Required output: 1. Summary: N Figma components total (per tier), % traceable overall 2. Delta vs previous snapshot (ADDED / RENAMED / DEPRECATED / RESCOPED counts) 3. Top 5 priority queue entries with rationale 4. Open questions surfaced (ambiguous tier, proposed-rename pairs, etc.) 5. Recommended next command (typically `component-spec` on the #1 priority entry) ### Claim grounding (active epistemic humility) **Claim grounding (active epistemic humility).** This block governs what you may assert and how you record it. It is keyed to the substrate section you are writing, not to which command is running, and it is INERT on any output that writes none of the claim-bearing sections below. Full contract and rationale: `wos/active-epistemic-humility.md`. 1. When this applies. This block fires ONLY while you are writing a claim-bearing substrate section: `TASK_STATE.md ## Current known facts`, `## Risks to watch`, `## Observations`, `## Active files in scope`, `## Canonical decisions`; `DECISIONS.md ## Locked decisions`; `IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md ## Current gaps`, `## Risks and mitigations`; `IMPACT_ANALYSIS.md`; `EXTERNAL_RESEARCH.md`; `REFERENCES.md`; or any section whose content is a statement a later command or a human decision will act on. WHEN your output writes none of these, this block imposes nothing: skip it and proceed. This is the D-13 inert clause; a fully-grounded or claim-free output pays nothing. 2. The unit is the load-bearing claim. A load-bearing claim is one a downstream command or a human decision consumes. A passing aside is not load-bearing; a statement someone will act on is. Apply the rest of this block per load-bearing claim, not per sentence. 3. Ground it or abstain. Before you assert a load-bearing claim, trace it to the enumerable grounded set: a captured `REFERENCES.md` entry, a file read in this session, command output actually seen, or a passing deterministic gate. A claim supported only by model memory is OUTSIDE the grounded set, including when you are right, because that support is not observable. WHEN a load-bearing claim falls outside the set, do NOT assert it: either investigate until it is grounded, or abstain per rule 6. 4. Status records provenance, never confidence. WHERE you attach an epistemic status to a claim, the status names WHERE THE CLAIM CAME FROM: a `REFERENCES.md` entry title, a file path plus line, or the gate output it came from. It SHALL NOT express a degree of certainty. Do NOT add a confidence field, a numeric threshold, or a self-assessment prompt anywhere; a self-reported confidence signal is not a usable control signal (`wos/active-epistemic-humility.md` Part 1.3). A status whose referent slot is empty is read as UNKNOWN, not as a weak yes. 5. Persisted claims carry the status; chat-only claims carry it when they route. Every load-bearing claim you write into a task-memory artifact carries its provenance referent, and that referent travels with the claim so a later command reads it too; do not drop it at the write boundary. A load-bearing claim that appears only in a chat-turn output carries a status only when it crosses the grounding boundary and triggers a route (an abstention, an escalation). 6. Abstain as a routed continuation, never a bare refusal. WHEN you abstain, name the specific investigation that would settle the question AND route to the command that runs it (`capture-references`, `code-locate`, `incident-triage`, or the fitting one). A withholding that stalls the work is invalid output. Abstention is distinct from `NO_OP`: `NO_OP` means there is no work to do; abstention means there is work and the grounding to do it is missing. 7. An unfired gate is not evidence. The absence of a fired check does not mean grounding existed. Do not read silence here as a pass. ### Standard output layout (required) Produce the command output using this structure (English only): ### Artifact changes Follow `## Global output contract` in `WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md` for `APPLIED` / `PROPOSED` / `SKIP` rules. ### Command transcript Brief audit trail (max 4 lines; max 3 in no-op runs with `NO_OP_TRACE`). ### Handoff Use the adaptive ending format from `WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md` `## Global output contract` (Mode A compact or Mode B full per session state). ### Definition of done (command output) - Every Figma component present in the source is represented as a row in the inventory file. - Each row has tier inferred + node ID + spec/code/story columns filled (present or empty). - Coverage summary recomputed with current counts and `% traceable`. - Delta section reflects ADDED / RENAMED / DEPRECATED / RESCOPED vs previous snapshot (or "first snapshot" note). - Priority queue refreshed; top 5 entries have rationale. - No code, spec, or story files modified by this command (read-only against the WOS-UI surface). - Before declaring this output done, confirm it satisfies the shared **Definition of done (command outputs)** and **Gate conditions** in WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md. Quality bar: Every claim about traceability ("spec exists" / "code exists" / "story exists") must reflect actual file presence checked at runtime, not inferred from past inventory state.