--- name: isr-workflow description: Use when deciding which isr-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an Information Systems Research (ISR) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills. Knows ISR's sociotechnical, intradisciplinary mission and its co-equal behavioral and analytical genres. --- # Information Systems Research Workflow (isr-workflow) ## Overview This is the router. It does not replace any specialized skill; it tells you **which isr-* skill to use right now** for your Information Systems Research (ISR) manuscript. Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as ISR — the INFORMS quarterly at the intersection of technology, organizations, economics, and society, and a member of the IS field's **Senior Scholars' Basket of Eight**. ISR's identity is deliberately **sociotechnical and intradisciplinary**: it is receptive to the design, management, use, valuation, and impacts of IT across multiple levels of analysis (individuals, groups, firms, networks, societies, nations), and it houses **both** rigorous behavioral/empirical research **and** analytical economic, econometric, and design-science modeling as **co-equal** first-class genres. The recurring editorial question is not only "is the method sound?" but "does this **bridge IS silos** and advance our intradisciplinary understanding of the sociotechnical?" > Editorial team changes: Suprateek Sarker (University of Virginia, McIntire) is the current Editor-in-Chief (inaugural editorial ISR 34(1):1-4, Feb 27, 2023); the 2025 multimethod-research framework editorial (ISR 36(2)) formalizes guidance for combining qualitative, quantitative, and analytical methods. Verify the current masthead and policies at pubsonline.informs.org/journal/isre — exact term dates and the submission fee are 待核实. ## When to trigger - "What should I do next?" with a half-built ISR manuscript - You have an analytical model or a dataset but no clear sociotechnical, intradisciplinary story - A reviewer/SE pushes on "contribution to IS" or "this is single-paradigm" and you are unsure which stage is the bottleneck - You received an ISR decision letter and need to switch into response mode - You keep bouncing between modeling/analysis, theory, and writing without a plan ## Routing table | Current symptom | Next skill | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------| | Idea is vague; unsure it fits ISR's sociotechnical/intradisciplinary bar | `isr-topic-selection` | | Mechanism is thin (behavioral hypotheses or analytical propositions) | `isr-theory-development` | | Front end reads as single-silo; does not bridge IS conversations | `isr-literature-positioning` | | Design/genre may not match the question (behavioral vs analytical vs DSR) | `isr-methods` | | Have data/model; unsure about identification, validity, or proof rigor | `isr-data-analysis` | | Results exist but the "contribution to IS" is thin or single-paradigm | `isr-contribution-framing` | | Exhibits cluttered, off INFORMS style, or proofs crowding the main text | `isr-tables-figures` | | Prose is jargon-heavy, passive, or buries the argument | `isr-writing-style` | | Ready to submit; need the ScholarOne preflight + contribution statement | `isr-submission` | | Want to understand how ISR's SE/AE review works before/after submit | `isr-review-process` | | Received an R&R; need to plan and draft the response | `isr-rebuttal` | ## Default order 1. `isr-topic-selection` — lock a sociotechnical question with ISR fit (vs MISQ/JMIS/MS) 2. `isr-theory-development` — build the mechanism (behavioral hypotheses **or** analytical propositions) 3. `isr-literature-positioning` — bridge IS silos; state the intradisciplinary conversation you join 4. `isr-methods` — match the genre (behavioral empirical / analytical-economic / design-science / multimethod) 5. `isr-data-analysis` — identification and validity (empirical) or proof discipline (analytical) 6. `isr-contribution-framing` — turn results into an explicit contribution to IS (drafts the ~500-word statement) 7. `isr-tables-figures` — finalize exhibits; push proofs/measurement to the electronic companion 8. `isr-writing-style` — full-manuscript prose polish 9. `isr-submission` — ScholarOne preflight (anonymization, contribution statement, editor/reviewer nominations) 10. `isr-review-process` — set expectations for the SE-led, fit-gated process 11. `isr-rebuttal` — after an R&R, plan revisions then draft the response > `isr-tables-figures` and `isr-writing-style` are **late-stage polish**. Do not invoke them while the contribution or identification/proof is still unsettled. ## Difference vs. MISQ / JMIS / Management Science stacks - **ISR**: sociotechnical and **intradisciplinary**; behavioral **and** analytical/design-science as co-equal genres under one cover; INFORMS (OR/economics lineage); 32-page text / 38-page total cap; SE/AE routing with an EIC fit gate. - **MISQ**: sister Basket-of-Eight journal with a stronger **design-science genre identity** and its own theory/method conventions — different house norms. - **JMIS**: Basket-of-Eight; overlapping scope but distinct editorial conventions. - **Management Science**: also INFORMS, but a broader management/OR journal (and the one that charges the $79 original-submission fee) — not IS-specific. ## Anti-patterns - **Do not** skip `isr-theory-development` and jump to estimation/derivation — ISR rejects atheoretical phenomenon-mining. - **Do not** let `isr-tables-figures` beautify exhibits before the model and contribution are settled. - **Do not** treat a single-paradigm result as automatically ISR-fit — the journal prizes intradisciplinary, silo-bridging work. - **Do not** let `isr-writing-style` substitute for a real contribution to IS — polish cannot rescue thin theory or a non-identified design.