--- name: nature-energy description: Use when targeting Nature Energy or deciding whether an energy research manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. --- # Nature Energy (nature-energy) ## Journal positioning Nature Energy publishes research that advances understanding of energy generation, distribution, storage, and use — spanning the full chain from materials and devices through systems, economics, and policy. It is the Nature-portfolio energy flagship and distinguishes itself from specialized energy journals by requiring that papers have significance for the broad energy-research community, not just one subfield. A solar-cell paper must speak to the materials scientist and the energy-systems analyst; an energy-policy paper must be grounded in physical or technical reality. The readership is intentionally cross-disciplinary across energy's natural-science and social-science interfaces. This skill is a **fit / venue-selection / re-framing** tool. It does not replace the journal's current official submission guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live author instructions on the Nature Portfolio site. ## When to trigger - The author names Nature Energy as the target venue for a high-significance energy research manuscript. - An energy paper spans materials/devices and systems/policy in a way that exceeds the scope of a specialist journal. - The author needs to assess whether an energy materials advance is better placed at Nature Energy vs. Joule vs. Advanced Energy Materials vs. Energy & Environmental Science. - The author needs Nature Energy's desk-reject triggers and credible re-routing options before submitting. ## Scope & topic fit - Solar energy: photovoltaics (all technologies), solar fuels, concentrating solar — when a new efficiency mechanism, degradation principle, or scalability pathway is established, not just a PCE record. - Electrochemical energy storage and conversion: batteries, fuel cells, electrolyzers — when the advance reveals a new materials principle, reaction mechanism, or system design insight, not a metric improvement alone. - Energy systems, grids, and integration: modeling, scenario analysis, or empirical studies on energy transition, grid stability, or demand-side management — when quantitative rigor and broad significance are clear. - Energy economics and policy: techno-economic analysis, lifecycle assessment, policy impact evaluation — when the methods are rigorous and the findings inform real-world energy decisions at scale. - Thermal energy, nuclear, hydrogen economy, or carbon capture when a conceptual or systems-level advance is the centerpiece. - Cross-cutting themes: energy access, energy justice, and the social dimensions of the energy transition — when quantitatively grounded and scientifically rigorous. ## Method & evidence bar - Materials/device papers must connect microscale mechanism to device- or system-level performance: a new electrolyte chemistry must be evaluated in a realistic cell configuration, not only in half-cells or coin cells. - Systems/modeling papers must use validated, transparent models with clearly stated assumptions; sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification are expected. - Techno-economic and lifecycle analyses must use current, documented data sources and report results across a range of scenarios, not just the most optimistic case. - Policy and social-science papers must meet the standards of their own methodological community (causal identification, survey design, etc.) — Nature Energy does not lower the bar for quantitative rigor in these domains. - Stability and durability testing for materials/device papers must be conducted under realistic operating conditions; short-term performance under ideal conditions is insufficient for Nature Energy claims. - Data transparency: datasets, model code, and processed data should be deposited or made available; re-check current deposition requirements on the live guide. ## Structure & house style - Nature Energy publishes Articles, Letters, and Reviews (re-check current type options on the live guide); format conventions follow the Nature portfolio standard. - The introduction must establish the energy-system significance of the advance — not just the materials-science or policy significance alone, but why it matters for how humanity produces, stores, or uses energy. - Every paper, regardless of subfield, must articulate how the advance moves the needle on an energy challenge that is globally relevant. - Extended Data and Supplementary Information carry full protocols, extended datasets, and secondary analyses; the main text should read as a self-contained narrative. - Nature's reporting summary and data/code availability statement are required; re-check current standards. - A plain-language summary of the broader energy significance is expected in the abstract or in a significance statement. ## Official-submission checklist - Before giving submission-ready advice, read `../../resources/source-basis.md` and `../../resources/official-source-map.md`; start from the official source anchors for this journal family, then cite the current journal-specific page you checked. - Search the live site for "Nature Energy author instructions" and follow the current Nature Portfolio version. - Re-check article-type definitions and word/figure/Extended Data limits. - Re-check Nature's reporting summary requirements (statistics, reproducibility, datasets, models, code). - Confirm data and code availability statement requirements and any deposition obligations. - Re-check competing-interests, funding, author-contribution, and AI-use disclosure requirements. - Re-check preprint and embargo policies; coordinate with Nature's press office for high-profile submissions. - If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win. ## Pre-submission self-check - [ ] One sentence stating the energy-system significance: how does this advance change what is possible in energy generation, storage, or use at meaningful scale? - [ ] The materials/device advance is demonstrated in a realistic configuration (full cell, stack, or module), not only in idealized lab conditions. - [ ] Systems/modeling assumptions are stated and sensitivity-tested; the most optimistic scenario is not the headline result. - [ ] The paper speaks to the cross-disciplinary Nature Energy readership — not only to materials scientists or only to economists. - [ ] Extended Data, reporting summary, and data/code availability are complete. - [ ] Stability and durability data are included where the framing invokes practical applicability. ## Common desk-reject triggers - A PCE record or new electrolyte material evaluated only in half-cells or small-area devices, with no system-level contextualization or stability demonstration. - A modeling or policy paper with opaque assumptions, no uncertainty quantification, and results presented only for the best-case scenario. - Scope too narrow: an excellent battery electrode materials paper that belongs in Advanced Energy Materials or Energy & Environmental Science but lacks the systems-level significance Nature Energy requires. - Framing that is entirely materials-centric with no connection to energy system performance, cost, or deployment. - An incremental improvement in a competitive device metric (e.g., 0.5% PCE gain) with no new mechanistic insight. - Stability data collected only under mild or short-term conditions presented as evidence for practical durability. ## Re-routing decision - Strong energy materials advance below Nature Energy's systems-significance threshold → `joule` (Cell Press; quantitative, device-to-systems, sustainability-focused) or `energy-and-environmental-science` (RSC). - Materials advance is the dominant story → `nature-materials` or `advanced-materials`. - Environmental impact or carbon/emissions framing is central → `nature-climate-change` or `environmental-science-and-technology`. - Sustainability systems framing → `nature-sustainability`. - Nanoscale mechanism is the key advance → `acs-nano` or `nature-nanotechnology`. ## Output format ```text [Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason) [Target] Nature Energy [Topic tags] <2–3 closest topics> [Method/evidence] [Top risk] [Official items to re-check]
[Re-route suggestion] ```