---
name: rti-appeal-drafter
title: India RTI Appeal Drafter
description: Analyse and draft first and second appeals under Section 19 of India's Right to Information Act, 2005, including delay, deemed refusal, exemptions, severability, third-party process, burden, and relief. Use after an RTI response, non-response, excess fee, incomplete disclosure, or First Appellate Authority order.
author: rohasnagpal
author_url: https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/tree/main/plugins/vclo-by-rohas/skills/rti-appeal-drafter
license: MIT
version: 0.1.0
execution_mode: open
jurisdiction: general
practice: litigation
language: en
---

# India RTI Appeal Drafter

Read and apply the [India Counsel instructions](../../agents/india-counsel.md) before substantive analysis or drafting.

## Jurisdiction gate

This skill applies Indian law and procedure only. Before substantive analysis or drafting, confirm that the matter is governed by Indian law and identify the relevant State, court, tribunal or authority where material.

If the matter is governed by another jurisdiction, or the governing jurisdiction is unclear, do not apply Indian rules. State the scope mismatch and ask for the governing jurisdiction or route the request to an appropriate jurisdiction-neutral skill.


I am using the **RTI Appeal Drafter** skill from Rohas Legal AI: remedy selection, limitation, grounds and relief for RTI appeals and complaints (India). Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

Choose the remedy before drafting. Distinguish a Section 19(1) first appeal, a
Section 19(3) second appeal, and a Section 18 complaint; they differ in forum,
record, powers, limitation, and suitable relief.

## Intake

Obtain the application, proof and date of filing, fee, transfer notices, PIO reply
and enclosures, dispatch and receipt dates, First Appellate Authority appeal and
order if any, later disclosures, the information still missing, prejudice, delay
explanation, public-interest facts, and the applicable Central or State authority.

## Analysis and drafting method

1. Build a procedural chronology and calculate the statutory response and appeal
   dates under the current Act and applicable rules. Identify deemed refusal,
   defective transfer, delayed supply, and any condonation needed.
2. Map every original request item to the response, disclosure, exemption, fee,
   omission, or redirection. Do not enlarge the application through the appeal.
3. Test whether the cited exemption applies to the particular record and time.
   Address reasons, public-interest override where available, partial disclosure
   and severability, third-party procedure, and information already public.
4. Challenge unsupported denials, generic exemption recitals, failure to decide
   item by item, unreasonable form or fee, incomplete or illegible records, failure
   to transfer, and failure to provide appellate particulars.
5. For a first appeal, state jurisdiction, timeliness, facts, itemised grounds, and
   precise disclosure or procedural relief. Do not ask the First Appellate Authority
   to exercise penalty powers reserved to an Information Commission.
6. For a second appeal, comply with the current Commission's form, annexures,
   service, verification, pagination, and limitation rules. Address the public
   authority's Section 19(5) burden and request only relief within Commission powers.
7. If the real complaint concerns refusal to accept an application, absence of a
   PIO, obstruction, or another Section 18 ground, explain the complaint route and
   whether a disclosure remedy still requires the Section 19 appeal path.
8. Verify current PIO, First Appellate Authority, Central or State Information
   Commission jurisdiction, portal, address, fee, rules, practice directions, and
   filing status as of the drafting date.

## Output

Provide the remedy-selection note, limitation calculation, issue matrix, filing-
ready appeal or complaint, indexed annexure list, service and filing instructions,
and a request-item-to-relief schedule. State missing evidence and assumptions.

## Guardrails

Do not confuse complaint and appeal, invent receipt dates, enlarge the original
request, claim penalty as automatic, or quote superseded rules or contacts. Preserve
proof of submission and require current forum requirements to be checked before filing.