--- name: selling-deaccessioning description: > Execute sales tactically — channel selection (auction vs dealer vs direct), consignment terms, reserve setting, guarantees and irrevocable bids, the tax-loss vs charitable trade-off. Use when planning a sale, deaccessioning part of a collection, executing a multi-year deaccessioning calendar, or comparing major-house consignment vs private treaty vs direct-to-collector channels. Action skill — workflow-driven. metadata: author: nirav version: "1.0" compatibility: Designed for Claude Code --- # Selling & Deaccessioning — The Mirror Image of Buying > **Type:** Action > **Suite:** The Collector > **Axis:** Horizontal > **Parent:** collector ## The Three Channels Every sale flows through one of three primary channels, and the channel choice is the largest determinant of net proceeds. | Channel | Discovery | Commission | Discretion | Best For | |---|---|---|---|---| | **Public auction** | Highest | High (10–25% seller's + ~25% BP funds the price discovery) | Lowest (public record) | Iconic / category-defining items with strong demand depth | | **Dealer / private treaty** | Medium | Lower (10–15% typical, sometimes 5–10% on big-ticket) | High (private, off-market) | Items the user wants to move without public attention; relationships matter | | **Direct / peer-to-peer** | Lowest | None (but legal/escrow costs) | Variable | Lower-value items, specialist communities, items where the user has the buyer network | ## Public Auction — The Major House Path ### Consignment Terms Major auction houses (Christie's, Sotheby's, Phillips, Heritage, Bonhams) charge a **seller's commission** that is typically 10–15% of hammer price for mid-tier consignments. For important lots, this is negotiable: - **Trophy lots** (defined loosely as $1M+ in expected hammer): houses often waive seller's commission entirely, funding their revenue solely from buyer's premium - **Seller's enhancement** (sometimes called "consignor's premium" or "guaranteed payment"): for the most coveted lots, the house may *pay* the consignor a percentage of the BP — effectively a negative seller's commission - **Mid-tier lots** ($50K–$1M): typically 8–12% seller's commission, negotiable - **Lower-value lots** (<$50K): 15–25% seller's commission, less negotiable The dynamic: for an important lot, the house competes with rivals for consignment, and the seller has leverage. For a routine lot, the house has leverage. ### Reserves The **reserve** is the minimum price the consignor will accept. Typical reserve structure: - Reserve set at **75–90% of the low estimate** is conventional - Reserve **cannot exceed the low estimate** at most major houses (rule designed to prevent reserve abuse) - Reserve is **undisclosed** to bidders — only the auctioneer knows - If the reserve is not met, the lot is **"bought-in"** (BI) — returned to consignor; cannot be re-listed at the same house for a defined period (typically 6–12 months) without major-house penalty **Reserve discipline:** - Too high → BI → "burned lot" status, harder to re-sell at acceptable price - Too low → underperformance → loss of consignor satisfaction with the house - A "burned" lot typically loses 15–30% of value on next attempt ### Guarantees and Irrevocable Bids For trophy consignments, the house may offer a **guarantee** — a minimum price the consignor receives regardless of auction outcome. The house bears the downside risk if the lot fails to hammer above the guarantee. The **irrevocable bid** is a related mechanism: a third-party bidder commits in advance to bid at a specified level. If the bidding doesn't exceed that level, the irrevocable bidder owns the lot. If it does, the irrevocable bidder typically receives a percentage of the upside as compensation. These mechanisms shift risk from the consignor to the house and the irrevocable bidder. They also distort "headline" auction results: a $50M hammer that was guaranteed at $40M is not the same as a $50M hammer with no floor. Catalog footnotes disclose these (look for "△" or "○" symbols at most houses). ### Major House Choice Each house has strengths by category: | House | Strongest Categories | |---|---| | **Christie's** | All major Impressionist / Modern / Contemporary / Old Masters / Asian art; jewelry | | **Sotheby's** | All major Impressionist / Modern / Contemporary; rare wines (Sotheby's Wine); books and manuscripts | | **Phillips** | Contemporary art; watches (under Aurel Bacs, the global watch auction leader); design | | **Bonhams** | Mid-tier across categories; classic cars; Asian art (especially in HK and London) | | **Heritage Auctions** | Coins, comics, sports cards, sports memorabilia, video games, currency, fine wine (a vast multi-category platform) | | **Phillips Editions** | Specialist sale for prints and multiples | | **Specialty houses** | Acker Merrall (wine), Hart Davis Hart (wine), Stack's Bowers (coins), Robert Edward Auctions (sports memorabilia), Swann Galleries (books, photographs) | ## Dealer / Private Treaty The mirror to buying from a dealer. The dealer takes the user's piece on consignment (or buys outright) and markets it through their channels. ### Terms - **Consignment**: dealer markets the piece, sells it, takes a commission (typically 10–25%), remits the rest. Risk: piece sits unsold for months or years. - **Outright buy**: dealer pays the user immediately, takes the inventory risk. Pricing reflects this risk — typically 50–70% of expected retail. - **Joint venture / partnership**: dealer and user share both the holding cost and the upside. More common for very high-value pieces. ### When Private Treaty Beats Auction - The user wants discretion (separation, financial distress, personal reasons) - The piece has a narrow buyer pool the dealer knows by name - The auction process would damage the piece's market positioning (over-shopped works "burn" if they fail to hammer) - The user is asset-rich and time-rich; auction process is faster than building dealer demand ## Direct / Peer-to-Peer For lower-value pieces or for users with their own buyer network: - **eBay / WhatNot** — dominant for sports cards and Pokémon under $5K; lower for higher value - **Specialty marketplaces** — Discogs (vinyl), Chrono24 (watches), CardLadder (cards) - **Discord and Instagram** — increasingly the front door for high-end card and watch flips; trust-mediated, payment via escrow services or trusted intermediaries - **Forum-based** (RedFlagDeals, dealer subreddits) — niche but active Net to the user is highest in P2P (no commission) but the work load is heaviest and the buyer pool is smallest. Best for users who collect actively and have networks; weak for users who want to liquidate quickly. ## Tax-Aware Selling ### Loss Harvesting Collectibles losses offset collectibles gains within the same tax year. Personal-use losses are non-deductible (the categorization matters — declare the collection as investment from day one if there's any chance of selling at loss). ### Sequencing Across Tax Years For multi-year deaccessioning programs, distributing sales across tax years can manage AGI bracketing and NIIT exposure. Coordinate with tax counsel before executing. ### Charitable Alternative For pieces with very low cost basis and the user has no urgent cash need, **donate instead of sell**: - Deduct full FMV (subject to 30% AGI ceiling for appreciated long-term tangible personal property) - Skip the 28% federal capital gains - Achieve the philanthropic goal The charitable route is structurally better than the sale-then-donate route for high-appreciation, low-basis pieces. (See `horizontal/tax-estate-legal/` for the procedural workflow.) ## Workflow — Multi-Year Deaccessioning Calendar For a $5M+ collection: ### Year 0 — Preparation - Engage 2–3 major-house specialists for confidential pre-consignment discussions - Commission fresh appraisals on all pieces above the user's significant-spend threshold - Categorize the collection by tier (trophy / important / supporting / entry) - Identify pieces for charitable donation (high appreciation, philanthropic alignment) vs sale (mid-appreciation, liquidity need) - Engage estate counsel for tax-sequencing analysis ### Year 1 — Trophies - Consign 2–3 trophy lots to major-house evening sales - Negotiate seller's commission down based on house competition - Consider guarantee or irrevocable bid structures - Observe pricing and demand signals; this informs Years 2–3 ### Year 2 — Mid-Tier - Based on Year 1 signals, consign next tier - Consider single-owner sale framing if the collection has a coherent identity (the Macklowe halo, the Anne Bass halo, the Paul Allen halo all added 10–30% to aggregate prices) - Sequence across multiple sales rather than dumping in one ### Year 3+ — Continued Deaccession - Mid-tier and entry-level pieces through specialty houses or dealer channels - Charitable contributions of selected high-appreciation pieces - Maintain core of pieces user genuinely wants to keep ## Workflow — A Single-Lot Sale Decision For a single piece the user is considering selling: 1. **Get 2–3 specialist opinions** — major-house specialists provide pre-consignment estimates for free; their estimates are bound by their own consignment hopes (slightly optimistic) but directionally useful 2. **Check recent comps** — same item / similar item, last 24 months, completed sales (not asking) 3. **Compute expected net** — high estimate × 0.85 (seller's commission and sale friction) × (1 − marginal tax rate) = net to user 4. **Compute alternative scenarios** — dealer private treaty, charitable donation, hold-until-death step-up 5. **Choose the channel** — based on net comparison, time horizon, discretion needs 6. **Time the sale** — major house "season" matters; sale dates vary by category (May/June and Nov for major NY evening sales, etc.) --- Connoisseur ─── A Burned Lot Carries the Scent of Failure When a piece fails to hammer above reserve at a major-house sale, the market remembers. Within the next 12–24 months, that same piece — even at a different house, even with a lower reserve — will trade at 15–30% below where it would have if the first sale had succeeded. This is the BI tax. The implication: be conservative with reserves on important lots; aim to clear reserve comfortably rather than to maximize the headline. A well-executed sale is one where the underbidder pushes hammer through the high estimate, not one where the auctioneer struggles to find the reserve. Allocator ─── The Channel Spread Is 20–30 Percent of Net For an identical $1M piece, the net to the consignor can range from $750K (high-friction auction with seller's commission and full BP) to $920K (charitable donation with full FMV deduction at 37% marginal effective rate) to $850K (dealer private treaty with negotiated 5% commission to user). That is a 23% spread on the same asset depending entirely on channel and structure. Channel selection is not a cosmetic decision — it is the largest single lever in the deaccession outcome, comparable in magnitude to the entire long-term price appreciation of the piece. Don't default to "auction" without modeling the alternatives.