--- name: submit-decision description: "Open a decision in Jupi (the team's decision platform) that the user can't settle alone and hand it to the right person to decide. Use whenever a question needs someone else's call — a blocker in a spec, an unresolved trade-off, anything needing a lead's or owner's sign-off — or when the user says \"ask X to decide this\", \"escalate this\", \"this needs approval from…\", \"raise this with the team\". Lean toward offering it the moment an open question surfaces that isn't the user's to close: capturing it as an assigned decision (with framing) beats leaving it buried in a doc where it stalls. This creates the decision and assigns a decider but deliberately does NOT finalize it — closing it is the assignee's job (for decisions the user has already made themselves, use log-decision instead)." --- # Submit decision ## What this is for Some questions aren't yours to close. The trade-off needs the eng lead's call; the scope cut needs the PM's sign-off; the compliance angle needs legal. Left in a doc, these stall — nobody owns them and they rot as comments. This skill turns an open question into a real, **assigned** decision in Jupi: framed with enough context for the decider to act, owned by you, and waiting on the right person to finalize. The line between this and `log-decision`: log records a call _you've made_; submit opens a call _someone else makes_. This skill never finalizes — doing so would put words in the decider's mouth. ## Tool you'll use `create-decision-tool` from the Jupi MCP server (may appear namespaced as `mcp__Jupi__…` or `mcp__claude_ai_Jupi__…`). There is intentionally **no** `finalize` step here. Inputs you'll pass: - `groupSlug` — the workspace. - `title` — the question, sharply stated. - `description` — the framing (see below). This is mandatory in spirit: a decision with no context is a decision the assignee can't act on. - `makerId` — the **Jupi user UUID** of the person who should decide. They become the decision's _maker_ (the only role allowed to finalize); you (the authenticated caller) are recorded as _owner_. - `allowWorkspaceContributions` — pass **`false`** (the default for this skill). The decision is then visible only to you (owner) and the assigned `makerId` — who can always see and finalize it — so submitting it does **not** notify or expose it to the whole workspace. This keeps a targeted hand-off targeted. Omit it (or pass `true`) only when the user explicitly wants everyone in the workspace to see and weigh in. - Omit `id` and `ownerId` — the server generates the id and sets you as owner. Returns `{ id, url, makerId, … }`. ## Getting the assignee's UUID (the one manual step) There is no MCP tool to look people up by name or email, so `makerId` has to be a UUID the user supplies. To make this bearable across repeated use, keep a small contacts map in `.claude/jupi.local.json` (gitignored) alongside the workspace: ```json { "workspace": "", "contacts": { "Jane Doe": "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111", "Eng Lead": "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222" } } ``` Resolve the assignee like this: 1. If the user names someone in `contacts`, use that UUID. 2. Otherwise ask the user for the person's Jupi user UUID, proceed, and offer to save it under their name in `contacts` so it's a name next time, not a UUID. If `workspace` is missing too, ask for it and offer to save. Never commit this file. ## Framing the question (the `description`) A good submission gives the decider everything they need and nothing they have to chase. Put this in `description`: - **Context** — what prompted the question, in a sentence or two. - **Options** — the alternatives you can see, if any, and their trade-offs. - **Your lean** — what you'd do and why, if you have a view. (A lean helps; it doesn't pre-empt — they still decide.) - **What's needed to decide** — the missing input, or what "done" looks like. **Format the `description` as HTML** — Jupi renders it as rich text, not Markdown. Use `

` for paragraphs, `