基于若依-vue-plus框架的全栈代码规范指南。定义后端Java Spring Boot与前端Vue3 + TypeScript的标准化编码模式。 核心内容： - 后端分层架构规范：Controller/Service/Mapper三层设计，对象流转模式（Bo/DTO → Entity → Vo） - 前端Vue3组合式API规范：
React Native coding patterns, best practices, and common solutions for mobile development. Use when implementing features or refactoring code.
Use the VSCode CLI to open files at specific line and column positions when explaining code, debugging, pointing to TODOs, or guiding users to specific locations in files.
Expert at TypeScript strict mode, linting, formatting, code review standards. Use when checking code quality, fixing type errors, or enforcing standards.
Audit TypeScript code for quality, complexity, coupling, and clean code violations. Use when reviewing code quality, checking for anti-patterns, assessing maintainability, or…
Code quality improvement: review, refactoring, debugging. Phases: review feedback, systematic refactoring, root cause debugging, verification.
Fix code quality issues identified in a code quality review stored in agent_artefacts/code_quality//.
Perform structured code reviews enforcing quality standards, naming conventions, architecture patterns, and team agreements.
Comprehensive code quality review focusing on DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself), KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid), and Clean Code (Easy to Read) principles.
Code quality standards including SOLID principles, design patterns, code smells, refactoring techniques, naming conventions, and technical debt management.
Analyzes codebase for refactoring needs, generates todo reports, and validates completion
Use when refactoring research code for publication, adding documentation to existing analysis scripts, creating reproducible computational workflows, or preparing code for sharing…
Refactor code for better organization, cleaner architecture, and improved maintainability. Use for reorganizing file structures, splitting large components, updating imports after…
Simplify and refactor code while preserving behavior, improving clarity, and reducing complexity. Use when simplifying complex code, removing duplication, or applying design…
Analyzes codebases by impact scope (low/medium/high), generates refactoring checklists, supports interactive review, executes refactors with QA, and produces detailed optimization…
Guides systematic code refactoring to improve code quality, maintainability, and design. Identifies code smells, applies refactoring patterns, ensures test coverage, and follows…
Remove code duplication by extracting shared logic into reusable components. Use when the same logic appears in multiple places.
Systematic approach to refactoring code for improved maintainability, performance, and clarity while preserving functionality
You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices.
Refactor overly large code units into smaller, more focused components. Use when code has grown too large or complex.
You are a technical debt expert specializing in identifying, quantifying, and prioritizing technical debt in software projects.
You are a technical debt expert specializing in identifying, quantifying, and prioritizing technical debt in software projects.
Explore external codebases to answer questions about their architecture, implementation, and behavior.
Deep code simplification and refactoring preserving behavior across Python, Go, TypeScript, Rust. Targets complexity, anti-patterns, readability debt.
Codex-native code-remediation loop: triage/apply code-review findings, rerun checks, publish unresolved gaps with measurable gates; `$code-remediate #123 +review` remediates a PR…
Battle-tested code review practices optimizing for codebase health and team velocity
Perform comprehensive code reviews covering security, style, performance, and best practices. Use when reviewing code changes before commit or merge, auditing existing code, or…
Automated code review analyzing security, performance, maintainability, and test coverage. Activated during code reviews or when conducting analysis.
AI-powered code review using CodeRabbit. Default code-review skill. Trigger for any explicit review request AND autonomously when the agent thinks a review is needed…
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality.
Complete code review workflow for both requesting and receiving reviews. Use when creating PRs, reviewing code, or responding to feedback.
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality.
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and — from…
Conduct thorough, constructive code reviews for quality and security. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking code quality, identifying bugs, or auditing security.
You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices.
Perform comprehensive code reviews with best practices, security checks, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, checking for security…
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human.
Use when reviewing REST or HTTP API endpoints, controllers, or route handlers. Covers HTTP status codes, idempotency, versioning, auth, pagination, error shapes, and rate…
Arlie projesine özel kod inceleme kontrol listesi ve standartlar. @reviewer agent'ının kullandığı detaylı inceleme kriterleri.
Augments human code review by summarizing changes, surfacing key review questions, assessing test coverage, and identifying low-risk sections.
Comprehensive PR review using multi-agent swarm with specialized reviewers for security, performance, style, tests, and documentation.
系統化的程式碼審查檢查清單和提交前品質關卡。 使用時機：審查 pull request、檢查程式碼品質、提交程式碼前。 關鍵字：review, PR, pull request, checklist, quality, commit, 審查, 檢查, 簽入。
系统化的程序码审查检查清单和提交前品质关卡。 使用时机：审查 pull request、检查程序码品质、提交程序码前。 关鍵字：review, PR, pull request, checklist, quality, commit, 审查, 检查, 簽入。
Automatic code review and fixes before showing to user. Use when: code generation is complete, before preview. Triggers: internal use only.
Code review checklist covering security, performance, defensive programming, and testing anti-patterns.
Revisão de código no padrão B2 Tech. Use quando o usuário pedir "revise o código", "code review", "audite essas mudanças" ou ao final de feature/PR.
Use when the user asks for a general code review (not a PR-specific review) and wants the reviewer mindset applied — flagging anything that looks wrong, but verifying with the…
Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability — from thoughtbot/guides
Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability — from thoughtbot/guides
Structured Salesforce code review for Apex, triggers, async, and tests before merge or deployment — governor limits, bulk-safe triggers, CRUD/FLS and sharing posture, meaningful…
Write review comments that land by labeling severity and separating genuine questions from directives.
Frameworks for giving and receiving code review feedback effectively. Use for PR comments, review strategies, handling disagreements, and balancing thoroughness with kindness.
Perform structured code reviews of C# source code covering naming conventions, performance, security, readability, and .NET best practices.
Building a positive code review culture that catches bugs, shares knowledge, maintains code quality, and builds team trust through effective review practices.
Use when reviewing code that touches the database or persistence layer. Covers index strategy, query count, N+1, transaction scope, migration safety, and connection pooling.
Expert in the human side of code review. Covers giving feedback that lands, receiving criticism gracefully, navigating disagreements, and building a healthy review culture.
Analyser du code modifie et lister les problemes en se basant sur les regles et conventions evan-workflow.
Transform code reviews from gatekeeping to knowledge sharing through constructive feedback, systematic analysis, and collaborative improvement.