Automate the mechanical parts of code review — diff analysis, convention checks, security risk surfacing, test coverage gaps, and PR-comment generation — so humans focus on architecture and judgment calls. Works across language stacks via tag overlap.
Related searches: claude code review skill, AI pull request review, claude PR comment generator, automated code review claude.
End-to-end Claude Design handoff to pull request: imports a handoff bundle from claude.ai/design, generates Storybook stories and Playwright tests, runs diff-aware browser verification, and opens a PR
general
Append a Mermaid diagram (sequence, flow, class, or entity-relation) to a GitHub PR's existing /review comment. Like Iago the parrot from Aladdin, this skill loudly squawks a visual summary on top of
general
PR-level merge gate. Audits the WHOLE pull request (not just the diff) against a merge-readiness contract: SPEC acceptance criteria met, all phases complete, docs updated per the doc map, Closes #N pr
general
End-to-end workflow for finishing a development branch. Use when implementation is complete and the branch is ready to ship -- runs verification checks, reviews the diff, picks the integration path (d
tools
Review incoming pull requests - fetch diff, analyze changes, post review comments. Triggers on: "review PR", "review pull request", "PR review", "check this PR", "review #123".
general
Identify trivial, low-risk pull requests in the `ready for maintainer review` queue of <upstream> that pass every quality gate and touch only supplementary areas (docs, changelog, translations, tests)
content
Use when: deciding whether a pull request, diff, or change set is too large or mixed to review in one pass, splitting an oversized PR into reviewable slices, separating refactor from behavior change o
engineering
Use when: auditing your own change before requesting review, running a pre-review or pre-PR self-check, checking diff hygiene, leftover debug code, commented-out code, unrelated changes, missing tests
general
Use this skill when creating or updating a pull request, updating a PR description, or generating PR content from commits and diffs. Handles the full PR workflow: consumes pre-computed context from sk
general
Acts as a critical self-reviewer for your own Pull Requests (draft or published). Instead of just leaving comments, it analyzes the diff and proactively suggests and applies concrete code fixes.
general
Multi-agent code review using Agent Teams. Summons up to 8 built-in Ashes (plus custom Ash from talisman.yml), each with their own dedicated context window. Handles scope selection, team creation, rev
general
Reviews pull requests for compliance regressions. Scans code diffs for security and compliance violations, flags issues, and suggests fixes aligned with frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST 800-53.
security
Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code
general
Review pull requests that change Compose UI by rendering @Preview composables on base and head and diffing them. Use when reviewing a UI PR locally, authoring an agent-opened PR that touches UI, or wi
general
Review pull requests for code quality, security vulnerabilities, best practices, and potential issues. Use when reviewing PRs, examining diffs, or providing code review feedback.
security
Perform critical code review with automated fix suggestions. Use when reviewing code changes, pull requests, specific files, or branch diffs. Triggers on requests like "review this code", "critical re
engineering
Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produ
engineering
Generate comprehensive, reviewer-ready code review documents from git diffs. Use this when the user provides code changes (git diff output, file changes, or asks to review code changes) and wants a st
general
Perform a structured code review of a pull request aligned with SDD principles. Activate when user mentions "PR review", "pull request", "review PR", "code review", "review this diff".
general
Security-focused pull request and diff review skill for finding newly introduced vulnerabilities, risky regressions, and missing security tests in changed code. Trigger when the user asks to: "review
security
Get the unified diff for a GitHub pull request. Use when the user wants to see code changes, review a diff, or understand what changed in a PR.
general
Manage stacked branches and pull requests with the gh-stack GitHub CLI extension. Use when the user wants to create, push, rebase, sync, navigate, or view stacks of dependent PRs. Triggers on tasks in
general
Review pull requests for code quality, security issues, and best practices. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code changes, or analyzing diffs before merge.
security
Create GitHub pull requests from a local branch using a reviewable workflow for branch checks, diff analysis, PR title/body writing, and gh CLI creation. Use when opening a PR, drafting or improving a
general
Generate and create pull request descriptions automatically using GitHub CLI. Use when the user asks to create a PR, generate a PR description, make a pull request, or submit changes for review. Analy
general
Utility scripts for GitHub pull request management. Includes tools for fetching bot-generated review comments (linters, security scanners, dependabot), replying to review threads programmatically, lis
security
Apply linuxlewis's code review style to pull requests, local diffs, or proposed code changes. Use when asked to review code the way linuxlewis would, emulate Sam Bolgert's review strategy, predict lik
engineering
Review pull requests, diffs, patches, or design proposals for the open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go repository with a senior maintainer mindset. Use when changes in opentelemetry-go may affect OpenTelem
general
Make your clanker your editor. A prose linter, a set of editor commands anchored in classical style guides (Strunk, Williams, Zinsser, Pinker, Orwell, King), and project commands for voice capture and
content
This ASE skill uses reviewdog to turn linter and analyzer output into diff-aware pull request feedback. An agent can run existing checks, filter findings to the changed lines, and publish inline revie
tools
SKILL.md files, not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Anthropic.