Claude Code Skills·Claude Skills·The open SKILL.md registry for Claude
ClaudSkills › Engineering › Code Quality › Page 17

Code Quality (Page 17 of 26)

1513 Claude Code skills in the Code Quality sub-category of Engineering.

1,513 skills · updated 2026-10-25 · showing 961–1020 of 1,513 by quality score

For the full experience including quality scoring and one-click install features for each skill — upgrade to Pro.

Refactor macOS SwiftUI views and scenes into stable structure. Use when splitting large views, tightening scene state, or narrowing AppKit escapes.
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and — from…
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements — from phamlongh230-lgtm/yamtam-engine
Run OpenAI Codex CLI from OpenClaw for coding tasks in a target project directory. Use when the user asks OpenClaw to use Codex for implementation, debugging, refactoring, review,…
Refactor an existing OpenClaw docs page with source-audited preservation, restructuring, and verification.
Orchestrate worker fleets over OpenClaw issues and PRs: prove root causes, prefer clean refactors over quick patches, land verified repairs, and close items proven fixed or no…
Delegate coding tasks to OpenCode CLI agent for feature implementation, refactoring, PR review, and long-running autonomous sessions.
Collaborate with OpenCode via ACP protocol for code modifications, refactoring, and feature implementation.
Delegate a coding task to the OpenCode CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself.
Run OpenCode (MiniMax) and Claude code reviews iteratively until both find no issues. Use after making changes and before committing.
Design and plan fixes/refactoring for an OpenSpec change from confirmed reviewer findings without editing code.
Use before you shorten, compress, or rewrite the BODY of an existing SKILL.md or agent .md — the moment you are about to cut text to reduce length.
Codex deep ops-safety review of a proposed Bash command BEFORE it executes. Invoke MANUALLY (via /ops-preflight) when the ops-risk-triage hook has emitted an `ask` for an…
Use the @steipete/oracle CLI to bundle a prompt plus the right files and get a second-model review (API or browser) for debugging, refactors, design checks, or cross-vali — from…
Use the @steipete/oracle CLI to bundle a prompt plus the right files and get a second-model review (API or browser) for debugging, refactors, design checks, or cross-vali — from…
Implement features or behavior-preserving refactors with the smallest complete change; route reported defects to orc-bugfix.
Orchestrate a behavior-preserving refactor — confirm tests are green, restructure without changing behavior, keep tests green, review, and gated commit.
Plan and execute large refactors with dependency-aware work packets and parallel analysis.
Forma C O3: one Task subagent per PLAN step (sdd-develop contract); parent never writes app code. Updates CONTINUITY; handoff to code-review.
Creates or updates an issue in the adopted PM tool from a type-specific template (bug, story, epic, etc.), including topical labels (e.g.
Keep notebooks synchronized with `.py` or `.md` representations so version control, review, and refactoring can happen outside bulky notebook JSON.
Use this whenever the user asks me to investigate code, compare options, plan a refactor, scope a spec, walk through a PR, decide between approaches, weigh tradeoffs, review a…
Upgrade Palantir Foundry SDK versions and handle breaking changes. Use when upgrading foundry-platform-sdk, migrating between API versions, or detecting deprecations in Foundry…
Use when fixing widespread errors such as lint, type, test, or repetitive refactor issues that can be partitioned across file groups.
Write C++ code following Sean Parent's "No Raw Loops" philosophy. Emphasizes algorithm-based thinking, composition over iteration, and treating code as mathematical reasoning.
Lisa-native code review of the current git diff. Walks every changed hunk and reports correctness bugs, security issues, and obvious defects as severity-ranked findings with…
AI Assistant untuk optimasi kode otomatis. Bukan hanya scanner pola, tapi asisten pribadi yang belajar dari gaya coding-mu, memberi saran proaktif, auto-refactor, dan meningkat…
Generate a complete feature design specification (design.md, tasks.md) and Gherkin scenarios from natural language requirements.
Rename the current Claude session for peon-ping notifications and terminal tab title. Use when user wants to give this session a custom name like "/peon-ping-rename Auth…
Use when developing or reviewing Python code for a scientific package (e.g., cooltools) that targets collaborative development with multiple contributors.
Persistent planning system with 3 markdown files (PLAN.md, PROGRESS.md, CONTEXT.md). Use when starting large features, multi-session work, or complex refactoring.
Code quality and technical debt management decision framework for systematic refactoring and simplification.
Use ao revisar mudanças recentes Laravel ou Angular do Petrvs-PGD antes de merge, especialmente back-end, com postura Tech Lead, validação obrigatória de Repository Pattern,…
pf-frontend 프로젝트 컨벤션과 React 19 Best Practices 기반 코드 리뷰. "코드 리뷰", "리뷰해줘", "이 코드 괜찮아?" 요청 시 사용.
Phase-level verification gate run at a v3.x phase boundary (the post-phase analog of verify-plan). Spawns three independent full-context lenses in parallel — PM (honesty-auditor)…
Phase agent that triages a Linear ticket — expands acronyms, classifies (feature/bug/docs/refactor/chore), identifies genuine blockers (a semantic second-pass over the backlog —…
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface ass — from…
Executa a Fase 2 do refactor Kryonix — quebrar o monólito de packages usando callPackage, dar casa ao CLI shell, ao kryonix-home (Rust), ao instalador (Rust+Vite) e ao Doctor TUI,…
Reviews Phoenix code for controller patterns, context boundaries, routing, and plugs. Use when reviewing Phoenix apps, checking controllers, routers, or context modules.
Code-craft guardrails that reduce the most common LLM coding mistakes — think before coding, simplicity first, surgical changes, and verifiable success — gated by objective…
Delegate a coding task to the Pi coding agent CLI (`pi`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself.
Use for any task that spans more than a couple of steps, files, or sessions — refactors, migrations, multi-file features, anything that must survive a context reset or crash.
Refuses to start coding if the estimated change is larger than a threshold. Forces plan-mode for big tasks so they don't get cowboyed in one turn.
Create an implementation plan for a new feature, refactor, or fix. Guides an interactive design discussion and produces a structured plan document.
Structured task planning with clear breakdowns, dependencies, and verification criteria. Use when implementing features, refactoring, or any multi-step work.
Structured task planning with clear breakdowns, dependencies, and verification criteria. Use when implementing features, refactoring, or any multi-step work.
Apply structured thinking before coding. Use when: starting new features, making architectural decisions, refactoring large components, or evaluating implementation approaches.
Planning philosophy, patterns, and practices for implementation planning. Use when planning features, architectural changes, or refactoring.
Converts a refactor map into a phased plan using parallel-change, branch-by-abstraction, or strangler fig patterns.
Use when a Shiny application or R package currently runs only on Windows and you need to enable deployment on Linux or macOS.
Ensemble code review with specialized reviewer personas. Has full (9-persona) and lightweight (4-persona) modes.
Review PooCommerce code changes for coding standards compliance. Use when reviewing code locally, performing automated PR reviews, or checking code quality.
Confidence-based code review that filters issues to 80+ threshold, eliminating false positives and noise.
Multi-agent orchestration system using Claude Code's native background agents (2.0.64+) for true parallel collaboration.
Angular 20 conventions for the Alexis Trejo portfolio—standalone components, zoneless SSR, routing, services, file layout, naming, and data patterns.
Use when a Godot/.NET task needs a Layer 4 overlay completion review after a large refactor, multi-file implementation, or new feature, and the agent must assess layer boundaries,…
Spin up a PR code review sub-agent. Ranks bugs critical/high/medium/low, eliminates false positives, writes consolidated report, applies KISS/DRY fixes (main logic only, skip…
GitHub PRのレビューコメントを自動検出し、コード修正を適用する。インラインスレッド・レビュー本文・Issueコメントに対応し、CodeRabbit・Copilot等のbotコメントも処理する。PRレビュー後の修正作業を自動化したい場合に使用する。Do NOT use for レビュー自体の実施(ai-code-reviewを使用すること)。
Walk a maintainer through deep code review of open pull requests on the configured `` repo (default: read from `/project.md → upstream_repo`).
Sweep open pull requests on the configured `` repo (default: read from `/project.md → upstream_repo`), classify each one against the project's quality…
All Engineering skills →
More in EngineeringTesting (4,356) · Devops (3,948) · Architecture (3,203) · Backend (2,624) · Frontend (1,764) · Languages (1,535) · Cloud Platforms (1,362) · Databases (927) · Performance (896) · Mobile (660) · Observability (465) · Data Engineering (410) · Docs Engineering (343) · Workflow Orchestration (304) · ML AI Eng (285) · API Tooling (25)