Perform structured code reviews enforcing quality standards, naming conventions, architecture patterns, and team agreements.
Comprehensive code quality review focusing on DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself), KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid), and Clean Code (Easy to Read) principles.
Code quality standards including SOLID principles, design patterns, code smells, refactoring techniques, naming conventions, and technical debt management.
Analyzes codebase for refactoring needs, generates todo reports, and validates completion
Use when refactoring research code for publication, adding documentation to existing analysis scripts, creating reproducible computational workflows, or preparing code for sharing…
Refactor code for better organization, cleaner architecture, and improved maintainability. Use for reorganizing file structures, splitting large components, updating imports after…
Simplify and refactor code while preserving behavior, improving clarity, and reducing complexity. Use when simplifying complex code, removing duplication, or applying design…
Analyzes codebases by impact scope (low/medium/high), generates refactoring checklists, supports interactive review, executes refactors with QA, and produces detailed optimization…
Guides systematic code refactoring to improve code quality, maintainability, and design. Identifies code smells, applies refactoring patterns, ensures test coverage, and follows…
Remove code duplication by extracting shared logic into reusable components. Use when the same logic appears in multiple places.
Systematic approach to refactoring code for improved maintainability, performance, and clarity while preserving functionality
You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices.
Refactor overly large code units into smaller, more focused components. Use when code has grown too large or complex.
You are a technical debt expert specializing in identifying, quantifying, and prioritizing technical debt in software projects.
Battle-tested code review practices optimizing for codebase health and team velocity
Perform comprehensive code reviews covering security, style, performance, and best practices. Use when reviewing code changes before commit or merge, auditing existing code, or…
Automated code review analyzing security, performance, maintainability, and test coverage. Activated during code reviews or when conducting analysis.
AI-powered code review using CodeRabbit. Default code-review skill. Trigger for any explicit review request AND autonomously when the agent thinks a review is needed…
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality.
Complete code review workflow for both requesting and receiving reviews. Use when creating PRs, reviewing code, or responding to feedback.
Conduct thorough, constructive code reviews for quality and security. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking code quality, identifying bugs, or auditing security.
You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices.
Perform comprehensive code reviews with best practices, security checks, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, checking for security…
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human.
Arlie projesine özel kod inceleme kontrol listesi ve standartlar. @reviewer agent'ının kullandığı detaylı inceleme kriterleri.
Augments human code review by summarizing changes, surfacing key review questions, assessing test coverage, and identifying low-risk sections.
Comprehensive PR review using multi-agent swarm with specialized reviewers for security, performance, style, tests, and documentation.
系统化的程序码审查检查清单和提交前品质关卡。 使用时机：审查 pull request、检查程序码品质、提交程序码前。 关鍵字：review, PR, pull request, checklist, quality, commit, 审查, 检查, 簽入。
Automatic code review and fixes before showing to user. Use when: code generation is complete, before preview. Triggers: internal use only.
Code review checklist covering security, performance, defensive programming, and testing anti-patterns.
Revisão de código no padrão B2 Tech. Use quando o usuário pedir "revise o código", "code review", "audite essas mudanças" ou ao final de feature/PR.
Use when the user asks for a general code review (not a PR-specific review) and wants the reviewer mindset applied — flagging anything that looks wrong, but verifying with the…
Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability — from thoughtbot/guides
Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability — from thoughtbot/guides
Structured Salesforce code review for Apex, triggers, async, and tests before merge or deployment — governor limits, bulk-safe triggers, CRUD/FLS and sharing posture, meaningful…
Frameworks for giving and receiving code review feedback effectively. Use for PR comments, review strategies, handling disagreements, and balancing thoroughness with kindness.
Perform structured code reviews of C# source code covering naming conventions, performance, security, readability, and .NET best practices.
Building a positive code review culture that catches bugs, shares knowledge, maintains code quality, and builds team trust through effective review practices.
Expert in the human side of code review. Covers giving feedback that lands, receiving criticism gracefully, navigating disagreements, and building a healthy review culture.
Analyser du code modifie et lister les problemes en se basant sur les regles et conventions evan-workflow.
Transform code reviews from gatekeeping to knowledge sharing through constructive feedback, systematic analysis, and collaborative improvement.
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale.
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale.
Comprehensive code review expertise. Use when reviewing code, evaluating architecture, or assessing quality.
Automated code review for Arduino/ESP32/RP2040 projects focusing on best practices, memory safety, and common pitfalls.
/code-review-feedback-rust 커맨드로 실행되는 Rust 코드 리뷰 피드백 스킬. rust-coding-style.md(도메인 중심 진화형 코딩 원칙)를 1차 판단 기준으로, /code-review-rust와 동일한 9개 카테고리(R-01~R-09) 분석을 수행하지만, 소스 코드를 직접 수정하지 않고…
Review AI-generated code from a PM perspective: spec compliance, security red flags, data model soundness, UX issues in frontend code, and error handling against product…
Automatically applies when reviewing code. Ensures structured review checklist covering correctness, security, performance, maintainability, testing, and documentation.
Architect code review with DRY, YAGNI, abstraction, and test coverage principle enforcement
Proporciona ayuda para revisar código siguiendo las mejores prácticas de Roastr, verificando calidad, seguridad y documentación antes de crear un PR.
Kodun doğruluğunu, performansını, güvenliğini ve mimarisini analiz eder. Özellikle .NET Core (C#, EF Core, Web API) ve modern Frontend (React, Vite, TS) framework'leri için…
JavaScript-specific code review guidelines focusing on functional patterns and modern APIs
Activate senior code reviewer mode. Delivers thorough, constructive, and actionable code review feedback.
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before…
Systematic code review skill covering both requesting a review (pre-commit checklist) and receiving and responding to review feedback.
6-agent parallel code review orchestration covering architecture, security, performance, testing, quality, and documentation dimensions with weighted scoring.
Multi-dimensional code assessment across security, quality, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting (>=80%) and Router Contract generation.
Multi-dimensional code review across correctness, security, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting and remediation loops.
Use when reviewing code, PRs, or discussing code quality standards. Applies team coding standards and review methodology.
Comprehensive code review covering security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, best practices, and refactoring opportunities.