Expert at TypeScript strict mode, linting, formatting, code review standards. Use when checking code quality, fixing type errors, or enforcing standards.
Score 70/100
Code quality improvement: review, refactoring, debugging. Phases: review feedback, systematic refactoring, root cause debugging, verification.
Score 70/100
Fix code quality issues identified in a code quality review stored in agent_artefacts/code_quality//.
Score 70/100
Perform structured code reviews enforcing quality standards, naming conventions, architecture patterns, and team agreements.
Score 70/100
Comprehensive code quality review focusing on DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself), KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid), and Clean Code (Easy to Read) principles.
Score 70/100
Code quality standards including SOLID principles, design patterns, code smells, refactoring techniques, naming conventions, and technical debt management.
Score 70/100
Analyzes codebase for refactoring needs, generates todo reports, and validates completion
Score 70/100
Use when refactoring research code for publication, adding documentation to existing analysis scripts, creating reproducible computational workflows, or preparing code for sharing…
Score 70/100
Refactor code for better organization, cleaner architecture, and improved maintainability. Use for reorganizing file structures, splitting large components, updating imports after…
Score 70/100
Simplify and refactor code while preserving behavior, improving clarity, and reducing complexity. Use when simplifying complex code, removing duplication, or applying design…
Score 70/100
Analyzes codebases by impact scope (low/medium/high), generates refactoring checklists, supports interactive review, executes refactors with QA, and produces detailed optimization…
Score 70/100
Guides systematic code refactoring to improve code quality, maintainability, and design. Identifies code smells, applies refactoring patterns, ensures test coverage, and follows…
Score 70/100
Remove code duplication by extracting shared logic into reusable components. Use when the same logic appears in multiple places.
Score 70/100
Systematic approach to refactoring code for improved maintainability, performance, and clarity while preserving functionality
Score 70/100
You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices.
Score 70/100
Refactor overly large code units into smaller, more focused components. Use when code has grown too large or complex.
Score 70/100
You are a technical debt expert specializing in identifying, quantifying, and prioritizing technical debt in software projects.
Score 70/100
You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices.
Score 70/100
Perform comprehensive code reviews with best practices, security checks, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, checking for security…
Score 70/100
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human.
Score 70/100
Augments human code review by summarizing changes, surfacing key review questions, assessing test coverage, and identifying low-risk sections.
Score 70/100
Comprehensive PR review using multi-agent swarm with specialized reviewers for security, performance, style, tests, and documentation.
Score 70/100
系统化的程序码审查检查清单和提交前品质关卡。 使用时机：审查 pull request、检查程序码品质、提交程序码前。 关鍵字：review, PR, pull request, checklist, quality, commit, 审查, 检查, 簽入。
Score 70/100
Automatic code review and fixes before showing to user. Use when: code generation is complete, before preview. Triggers: internal use only.
Score 70/100
Code review checklist covering security, performance, defensive programming, and testing anti-patterns.
Score 70/100
Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability
Score 70/100
Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability
Score 70/100
Structured Salesforce code review for Apex, triggers, async, and tests before merge or deployment — governor limits, bulk-safe triggers, CRUD/FLS and sharing posture, meaningful…
Score 70/100
Frameworks for giving and receiving code review feedback effectively. Use for PR comments, review strategies, handling disagreements, and balancing thoroughness with kindness.
Score 70/100
Building a positive code review culture that catches bugs, shares knowledge, maintains code quality, and builds team trust through effective review practices.
Score 70/100
Transform code reviews from gatekeeping to knowledge sharing through constructive feedback, systematic analysis, and collaborative improvement.
Score 70/100
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale.
Score 70/100
Comprehensive code review expertise. Use when reviewing code, evaluating architecture, or assessing quality.
Score 70/100
Automated code review for Arduino/ESP32/RP2040 projects focusing on best practices, memory safety, and common pitfalls.
Score 70/100
Review AI-generated code from a PM perspective: spec compliance, security red flags, data model soundness, UX issues in frontend code, and error handling against product…
Score 70/100
Automatically applies when reviewing code. Ensures structured review checklist covering correctness, security, performance, maintainability, testing, and documentation.
Score 70/100
Architect code review with DRY, YAGNI, abstraction, and test coverage principle enforcement
Score 70/100
Kodun doğruluğunu, performansını, güvenliğini ve mimarisini analiz eder. Özellikle .NET Core (C#, EF Core, Web API) ve modern Frontend (React, Vite, TS) framework'leri için…
Score 70/100
JavaScript-specific code review guidelines focusing on functional patterns and modern APIs
Score 70/100
Activate senior code reviewer mode. Delivers thorough, constructive, and actionable code review feedback.
Score 70/100
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before…
Score 70/100
6-agent parallel code review orchestration covering architecture, security, performance, testing, quality, and documentation dimensions with weighted scoring.
Score 70/100
Multi-dimensional code assessment across security, quality, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting (>=80%) and Router Contract generation.
Score 70/100
Multi-dimensional code review across correctness, security, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting and remediation loops.
Score 70/100
Use when reviewing code, PRs, or discussing code quality standards. Applies team coding standards and review methodology.
Score 70/100
Comprehensive code review covering security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, best practices, and refactoring opportunities.
Score 70/100
Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.
Score 70/100
Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.
Score 70/100
Technical evaluation of code review feedback. Use when receiving review feedback - requires verification before implementing, no performative agreement, push back when technically…
Score 70/100
Review local codebase for bugs and CLAUDE.md compliance using multi-agent analysis
Score 70/100
Rust-specific code review guidelines focusing on error handling, safety, and idiomatic patterns
Score 70/100
Comprehensive code review and analysis. AUTO-TRIGGERS when user asks to review, refactor, debug, critique, or analyze code.
Score 70/100
Code review framework and criteria. References security-sentinel for security checks. Use when performing code reviews or defining review standards.
Score 70/100
Sous-agent spécialisé dans la revue de code automatisée, déclenchable par un agent parent pour analyser du code.
Score 70/100
Natural language wrapper for code review - automatically triggers /code-review when users express intent to review code, check for bugs, or validate code quality
Score 70/100
TypeScript-specific code review guidelines focusing on type safety and TypeScript idioms
Score 70/100
PR review, code smell detection, best practice kontrolü. ⚠️ Kod incelerken kullan. Deliverable kontrolü için → quality-validator, doküman review için → peer-review.
Score 70/100
Comprehensive code review skill for Wasp applications. Use when reviewing code, PRs, or architectural changes.
Score 70/100
Comprehensive code review skill for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Swift, Kotlin, Go. Includes automated code analysis, best practice checking, security scanning, and review…
Score 70/100
Use when reviewing code for quality, design issues, implementation problems, security vulnerabilities, or architectural concerns.
Score 70/100