Create and manage a DDD bounded context with standard directory structure
Score 70/100
Map relationships between bounded contexts and define integration contracts using DDD context mapping patterns.
Score 70/100
Practical DDD patterns for Jakarta EE web applications with cognitive load distribution. Use when designing controllers, entities, services, or evaluating cohesion and load…
Score 70/100
Use when creating new domain features or adding new business capabilities. Triggers on requests to "create feature", "add new domain", "new module", "scaffold feature", or when…
Score 70/100
Design DDD strategic artifacts including subdomains, bounded contexts, and ubiquitous language for complex business domains.
Score 70/100
Apply DDD tactical patterns in code using entities, value objects, aggregates, repositories, and domain events with explicit invariants.
Score 70/100
Validate domain boundaries -- detect cross-context import violations and aggregate invariant issues
Score 70/100
Web search via the DDGS metasearch library. Use for searching for unknown documentation, facts, or any web content. Lightweight, no browser required.
Score 70/100
Query DDInter drug-drug interactions via REST API (1.7M+ interactions, 2,400+ drugs). Search by drug name/ID for severity (major/moderate/minor), mechanisms, and clinical…
Score 70/100
Generate comprehensive investment memos for cyber•Fund investment committee decisions. Use when creating DD memos or investment analysis documents.
Score 70/100
Remove AI-generated jargon and restore human voice to text. Built from analyzing 1,000+ AI vs human content pieces.
Score 70/100
Remove telltale signs of AI-generated 'slop' writing from README files and documentation. Make your docs sound authentically human.
Score 70/100
Apply DE2 Factorization to separate multiplicative components to understand relative contribution of each factor.
Score 70/100
Store failed jobs for replay or manual inspection. Track failure patterns, enable manual intervention, and prevent data loss from processing errors.
Score 70/100
Skip update actions that point at missing local paths when a valid materialized entry already exists, preserving the working state instead of converting drift into a noisy failure.
Score 70/100
Generate a structured demo outline from your session's change log and git history. Reads .claude/critical_log_changes.csv and git log to produce presentation-ready talking points…
Score 70/100
Theo dõi và nhắc nhở hạn xử lý công văn, nhiệm vụ. Dùng khi người dùng nói "nhắc tôi về...", "thêm deadline", "việc gì sắp đến hạn", "hạn xử lý...", hoặc khi skill…
Score 70/100
Tracks every active real estate deal from email — where each transaction stands, what the next step is, which parties are involved, and what is stalling.
Score 70/100
Track pharmaceutical M&A, licensing, and investment deals. Use for competitive intelligence, market analysis, and identifying partnership opportunities.
Score 70/100
Win competitive rounds: run a clean process, deliver value previews before asking, coordinate partners, and manage timelines.
Score 70/100
End-to-end associate workflow with time-boxed gates: thesis -> sourcing -> meetings -> diligence -> memo, ending with either IC-ready memo or explicit kill decision.
Score 70/100
Use when the user is working for, advising, evaluating, or deciding how to engage with an organization where authority radiates from a single person at the center — lieutenants…
Score 70/100
Design large-scale systems using Jeff Dean's pragmatic approach. Emphasizes performance intuition, building reliable systems from unreliable components, and solving problems at…
Score 70/100
DearTs Framework 开发技能。基于 SDL3 + ImGui 的 C++20 现代应用框架，提供完整的应用生命周期管理、类型安全事件系统、Content Registry 和插件架构。适用于 DearTs Framework 相关的所有开发任务，包括应用程序开发、事件驱动架构、插件系统、多视图应用等。
Score 70/100
Build Debian packages with proper control files, dependencies, and maintainer scripts
Score 70/100
Wind/Wall/Door multi-perspective debate orchestration using debate-hall-mcp tools. Use when facilitating structured debates, architectural decisions, or multi-perspective analysis.
Score 70/100
Orchestrates formal debates with proposition and opposition sides, coordinating debaters and judges through structured exchanges.
Score 70/100
Spin up 2-3 expert personas to debate any topic from different angles. Structure: Opening statements, rebuttals, cross-examination, closing arguments.
Score 70/100
Start structured red vs. blue team debates via subagents. Use when exploring a topic from multiple adversarial perspectives.
Score 70/100
Structured multi-perspective debate for important architectural decisions and complex trade-offs
Score 70/100
Structured multi-perspective debate for important architectural decisions and complex trade-offs
Score 70/100
Inicia um debate estruturado entre agentes de um squad. 2 rounds: posições independentes com isolamento, depois rebuttals com cross-pollination.
Score 70/100
Expert Debian package builder specializing in git-buildpackage, debhelper, and Debian Policy compliance.
Score 70/100
· Administer Debian/Ubuntu/Mint/Pop: apt, dpkg, PPAs, snaps, systemd, GRUB, HWE, desktop. Triggers: 'debian', 'ubuntu', 'mint', 'popos', 'apt', 'dpkg', 'ppa'.
Score 70/100
Complete deBridge Protocol SDK for building cross-chain bridges, message passing, and token transfers on Solana.
Score 70/100
Communication retrospective — honest analysis of where user and Claude failed each other this session
Score 70/100
Analyze debt payoff software — avalanche vs snowball strategy engines, interest calculation accuracy, amortization schedules, payment scheduling automation, credit score impact…
Score 70/100
Diagnostique pourquoi un prompt produit des résultats indésirables et propose des corrections. À utiliser quand le LLM hallucine, ignore des instructions, donne un mauvais format…
Score 70/100
⚡ PRIMARY TOOL for: 'why is X broken', 'find bug source', 'root cause analysis', 'trace error', 'debug issue', 'find where X fails'.
Score 70/100
Manage evidence freshness by identifying stale decisions and providing governance actions
Score 70/100
Use when the user needs to choose, prioritize, or make a go/no-go decision among options.
Score 70/100
Decision modeling using decision tables, weighted scoring matrices, and decision trees. Structures complex decisions with clear criteria, alternatives evaluation, and outcome…
Score 70/100
Audits decisions for cognitive biases, runs premortems on plans, and reframes choices to reveal hidden assumptions.
Score 70/100
Create or update a Decision Interface Charter for recurring decisions
Score 70/100
Structured decision critic that systematically stress-tests reasoning before commitment surfacing hidden assumptions verifying claims and generating adversarial perspectives to…
Score 70/100
Use when an architectural choice is made, a library is selected, an approach is committed to, a convention is set, or any "we'll do it this way" moment occurs.
Score 70/100
Identify and formalize durable product and technical decisions from agent outputs into long-term memory.
Score 70/100
Freeze each tool result ID's replacement fate after it is observed so budget decisions stay deterministic across turns and forks.
Score 70/100
Triggers for automatically invoking the decision-framework skill before irreversible or high-blast-radius operations.
Score 70/100
M6.2 用户决策门标准模板。每个 phase 命令产物落盘后，LLM 必须按本 skill 调用 AskUserQuestion 让用户决策"接受/修改/新增/重生成"，未确认前禁止进入下一 phase。
Score 70/100
Query and analyze the AI Counsel decision graph to find past deliberations, identify patterns, and debug memory issues
Score 70/100
Reconstructs a chronological log of every significant decision made across project email threads — what was decided, who decided it, when, and what alternatives were considered.
Score 70/100
Transforms any decision discussion into a structured Decision Record with context, options considered, rationale, and trigger conditions for revisiting
Score 70/100
Capture architectural and implementation decisions with rationale to prevent re-debating. Creates and maintains DECISIONS.md.
Score 70/100
Decision rules for Claude Code skills, scripts, MDs, and workflows - project-agnostic patterns
Score 70/100
Structured decision-making framework — weigh options, evaluate trade-offs, deliver clear recommendations
Score 70/100
Structured approaches to decisions under uncertainty and complexity. Covers expected value, decision trees, multi-criteria decision analysis, System 1 vs System 2 allocation,…
Score 70/100
Aide à prendre une décision complexe en structurant les options et critères. À utiliser quand l'utilisateur hésite entre plusieurs choix.
Score 70/100
Map and optimize decision moments across Awareness, Consideration, Conversion, and Retention, then attach specific assets, visuals, and automations to each stage.
Score 70/100
Map and optimize decision moments across Awareness, Consideration, Conversion, and Retention, then attach specific assets, visuals, and automations to each stage.
Score 70/100